From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-x235.google.com (mail-ie0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::235]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C596832 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 15:08:10 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id tp5so5899947ieb.26 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2014 07:09:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=1SCReyT4XpREknvSfd8hnm/bujjNQAiC8Qb8K1qtZ3I=; b=pXIeJBQnSE05hFWVuSx/CSq9ypOKEI2dkQNjBWMHtBGmg7fsqPVMhWQ7OCF6oyhOgb 3LB6KZntTHS7kEAmQPx0pR5DjDai7hdMoHIS8lGq34S0DjqDMWu3QxMy9VKU8KzHugO8 RBCmW2DXsWcXDBAwKZSaQbDfwbO2hs00JX3KisOKR53lnsAERxLZ01UfBkkwpKE1EhJq xUqroyC7KsKgRiSIJ89NsFZZ+xarmLPqEikWJFGIlt76g6nuo5Pils/PoI/KYHpGLhOH Efcz5HUMBSW7gS0ItHzh+RAy6utULW9vLV5jjPlhmFMBYC7ICWa61XA0DGojp0HQPI6Z lsug== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.67.82 with SMTP id l18mr12821271igt.29.1394374179932; Sun, 09 Mar 2014 07:09:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.8.103 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 07:09:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.8.103 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 07:09:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8E6973B6CEA617469C62E4FDA1670F0631B1532B38@GUREXMB01.ASIAN.AD.ARICENT.COM> References: <8E6973B6CEA617469C62E4FDA1670F0631B1532B38@GUREXMB01.ASIAN.AD.ARICENT.COM> Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 10:09:39 -0400 Message-ID: From: Stefan Baranoff To: Chetan Bali Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Intel 82571EB PMD support X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2014 14:08:11 -0000 Chetan, I saw exactly that behavior with an 82599EB but running DPDK version 1.3.2 and CentOS 6.2 and the fix for me was upgrading to CentOS 6.4 - there was a thread a while back about a bug that caused DD to not be set but I can't seem to find it right now. I'm sorry I can't be of more help but at least this is a symptom that has been seen before. Regards, Stefan Sent from my smart phone; people don't make typos, Swype does! On Mar 7, 2014 5:18 AM, "Chetan Bali" wrote: > Hi, > > Do we have PMD support for intel 82571EB. We are having e1000e driver > supported for 82571EB in linux. > > DPDK Version : 1.6.0-r1 > > Linux Kernel : CentOS 6.4 [ kernel version 2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64 ] > > > Issue: > > When we run DPDK example [ l2fwd ], we are able to see successful init of > rte_pmd_em and link is also detected successfully. > But the RX, TX count are zero. If we try to fetch nic stats using > rte_eth_stats_get(), we can see around 256 ipacket count but after that > error count [rx error ] starts increasing. > > We are not able to see any packet on user app [ l2fwd ]. Does anyone else > face the same issue? > > Regards > Chetan Bali > > > > > > =============================================================================== > Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html > for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication. > > =============================================================================== >