From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f50.google.com (mail-oi0-f50.google.com [209.85.218.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26FF7AF87 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 17:14:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oi0-f50.google.com with SMTP id u20so11195754oif.9 for ; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 08:19:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9dYaXKQfcLYmuFYgeUCbolLpvM5K7lt2Csk01mirnWE=; b=kO7rpJ9cfciOt47ZoP0YW/liM7+g5ZLMd8h2xhaBykK3Z5ntE1pr9GQgvjOoYW4i9m KOcw+L1pkUfIRKGmVSjVIPDF93TcGCms7a0cNHcXizE3VeAVMh6eeVWSsf/sO7EEm+Sk QfTq3zfoBeJ6uX5AGYqxmG0IUS7cxDnRUxxmjMNByaMIMYsDRxxyOtKDLrc/QlwemZe5 8ftOibFIAoYIBeUtaHpC4yB44jNxIB/Kh+eu6vtkefFIm2tRjn0UZ6G9KEPQBfgWeoI9 yz8vfei0lXt4yXK6lKWnbbNtuKE6iL9ev2tFCtF1eeddvRfqfT19RRUihqlwfJFiukG7 lGww== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.56.193 with SMTP id c1mr40089058obq.4.1410275974978; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 08:19:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.232.8 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 08:19:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.232.8 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 08:19:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4a71bb41.1307.14857e341d5.Coremail.zimeiw@163.com> <20140909062016.GA7050@mhcomputing.net> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 18:19:34 +0300 Message-ID: From: Vadim Suraev To: Stephen Hemminger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack for DPDK X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 15:14:31 -0000 The licensing worms prevent IMHO only selling the source code, although, porting may be useful On Sep 9, 2014 5:54 PM, "Stephen Hemminger" wrote: > Porting Linux stack to DPDK opens up a licensing can of worms. > Linux code is GPLv2, and DPDK code is BSD. Any combination of the two > would end up > being covered by the Linux GPLv2 license. > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Vadim Suraev > wrote: > >> I've ported the Linux kernel TCP/IP stack to user space and integrated >> with >> DPDK, the source and documentation and the roadmap will be published (and >> announced) within few days. >> Regards, >> Vadim >> On Sep 9, 2014 9:20 AM, "Matthew Hall" wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 08:49:44AM +0800, zimeiw wrote: >> > > I have porting major FreeBSD tcp/ip stack to dpdk. new tcp/ip stack is >> > based >> > > on dpdk rte_mbuf, rte_ring, rte_memory and rte_table. it is faster to >> > > forwarding packets. >> > >> > Hello, >> > >> > This is awesome work to be doing and badly needed to use DPDK for any L4 >> > purposes where it is very limited. I'll be following your progress. >> > >> > You didn't mention your name, and compare your work with >> > https://github.com/rumpkernel/dpdk-rumptcpip/ , and talk about >> behavior / >> > performance, and how long you think it'll take. I'm curious if you can >> give >> > some more comments. >> > >> > I'm implementing an RX-side very basic stack myself... but I'm not using >> > BSD >> > standard APIs or doing TX-side like yours will have. >> > >> > Matthew. >> > >> > >