From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oa0-f41.google.com (mail-oa0-f41.google.com [209.85.219.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9642AF87 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 08:37:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id i7so11579981oag.0 for ; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 23:42:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=rLpuQqL0Z8S9GtLZCwpGYYK45qwV23haiMg4rVXnguI=; b=nou+jaRLEinnzlEzY9RTYX9ktqj0HXCf3928BbW7GjJ4xfHwB/Mq7NEmDC5jBVbdvO niZ31Z9cqhPdHRvvwfCU+Nj7n48N4MjQ6LYgSwP5tVinOPTNhdDhw/Wz4obCGJ4OQ5HJ etCMPoa4R2BWgxVwTeZSHCMKrMKZpqUdePzB3/6UxVLFQR1LpjJ8Lxiq6K3lBIAICF7S bM+2bwBpFB2rB/q70YvM3Fqqq3NPnmtva+yE6rpya8d21uY3m6v7O9KhWF6t/qsjAK/u ufk/N8hBsoMIj67GmTb6qI4Z8QROu5Vk1ZY3AKif0Tud77exMYBMmpe0t8vdr+cacXWD ztgw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.43.196 with SMTP id y4mr9030227oel.60.1410244963124; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 23:42:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.232.8 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 23:42:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.232.8 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 23:42:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4a71bb41.1307.14857e341d5.Coremail.zimeiw@163.com> <20140909062016.GA7050@mhcomputing.net> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 09:42:43 +0300 Message-ID: From: Vadim Suraev To: "Zhang, Helin" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack for DPDK X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 06:37:41 -0000 IMHO, since GPL is more restrictive so the source must remain open On Sep 9, 2014 9:39 AM, "Zhang, Helin" wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Vadim Suraev > > Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2014 2:30 PM > > To: Matthew Hall > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack for DPDK > > > > I've ported the Linux kernel TCP/IP stack to user space and integrated > with > > DPDK, the source and documentation and the roadmap will be published > (and > > announced) within few days. > > Any license issue of porting Linux kernel stack into DPDK? > > > Regards, > > Vadim > > On Sep 9, 2014 9:20 AM, "Matthew Hall" wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 08:49:44AM +0800, zimeiw wrote: > > > > I have porting major FreeBSD tcp/ip stack to dpdk. new tcp/ip stack > > > > is > > > based > > > > on dpdk rte_mbuf, rte_ring, rte_memory and rte_table. it is faster > > > > to forwarding packets. > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > This is awesome work to be doing and badly needed to use DPDK for any > > > L4 purposes where it is very limited. I'll be following your progress. > > > > > > You didn't mention your name, and compare your work with > > > https://github.com/rumpkernel/dpdk-rumptcpip/ , and talk about > > > behavior / performance, and how long you think it'll take. I'm curious > > > if you can give some more comments. > > > > > > I'm implementing an RX-side very basic stack myself... but I'm not > > > using BSD standard APIs or doing TX-side like yours will have. > > > > > > Matthew. > > > > > Regards, > Helin >