From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-la0-x234.google.com (mail-la0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::234]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649855904 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:34:47 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id y1so3263203lam.39 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:35:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WbBVQuhnRBW+ekrWQzbfh7GGkxmwtIKrXWsKTeiUfyg=; b=RgT+0TF9jgsruRn21nu0PHPTOR46PpwzmWzgtx5nrsgYM86fTkUSYSU7DkZYObZI3Y RJQkXwgBE+dLJBcm337DyApmHRXpMsqBu3hnwVyOMpBPZVKDP+MoluDxQk2LIZ+fez9n AXxtDmMEWzFtVJOGsjRnaFoDoTN6LVHQcuiAbUMP3FWUOKcfoTGTqdMlljIu/yrjKlFc LXp+cq0aOz0zlJH2R9xIBCopnUevxpEUYRh1DAM14GAltX90rLzgc9fu3p2VMXtKCELa BCHj7aY8C4zVxbAwXktu8d98Jkk4CW0+DOtNZb8Fo6ColvnDFsDKYaj2lWB2a5CYLNKW MKGQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.22.131 with SMTP id d3mr6934725laf.52.1386725751469; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:35:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.59.164 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:35:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:35:51 +0800 Message-ID: From: Jose Gavine Cueto To: "dev@dpdk.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] kni question X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 01:34:47 -0000 Hi, I would like to ask if kni was intentionally provided mainly for PMD API users/developers ? Most of the examples emphasizes how to use the kni devices by upper level applications with sockets, however I haven't seen any usage where PMD APIs being used to send packets to knis. Is this possible to send packets to kni using PMD APIs , or perhaps if this is already implemented would it be possible to modify to core port topology ? Thanks, PePe -- To stop learning is like to stop loving.