From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-bk0-x22d.google.com (mail-bk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::22d]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCF46895 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 07:45:37 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-bk0-f45.google.com with SMTP id na10so80028bkb.18 for ; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 22:47:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=DZ8qyLg2I2i9Dj6XegKkCFvwvprLWZoXLhFY2zj1OtE=; b=OAmmv1YiElODb/h62GONfhmSxWUDRerClrR53+k0+ONnclvBqjsBWxh+rKN1tDQ16C DEo+uAwNI8aF0XPd7tupEbzCaeQv24uQemKCJ7FLTaYiD7p0XPUfY7coLb9E0JqAcHQx 1bX1GUtFzR6Oy/Z4P1/AUbjWbdMoYOjoOr6rvsCumk9UCe/Fay70GEEEyYrTjwKOBrgs Z5WcgJbzSOxnPNDir9IWxVO1upJv6D9yAr/VC0R8MgSDX7c70U5ynabtKNgEAaHSiNXx Ze7hryjtvCuSUKe2QZs3sujIhSC6octckM2xxeMn8ubaHQmP9aPTL6cvaY2cxpwQ4JFc IFgg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.204.97.68 with SMTP id k4mr38476bkn.56.1393915625056; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 22:47:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.80.66 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 22:47:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725808E7A34D@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725808E7A34D@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:17:04 +0530 Message-ID: From: Sharath To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] are these bypass api supported on Intel Bandon Beach card : of device id : 8086:155d X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 06:45:38 -0000 Thanks for the response Konstantin. The macro is enabled in my setup. The problem which I am facing now is, if I give time interval between the bypass and normal state. it is not working assume in the first run I will put the NIC into bypass then leave for 5 min later, in second run if I make the NIC into norm state using the same set of API, the NIC is not coming to norm state. the link state is showing as down. Is there any restriction/any other setting required to work with these api;s/ thanks, Sharath On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin < konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Yes Bandon Beach should be supported starting from 1.5.1. > Though to enable it you need to set CONFIG_RTE_NIC_BYPASS=y in your config > file. > > Konstantin > > > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Sharath > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 6:13 AM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] are these bypass api supported on Intel Bandon > Beach card : of device id : 8086:155d > > can anyone please let me know about this... > > thanks, > Sharath > > > On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Sharath >wrote: > > > Hi > > > > we are using DPDK 1.5.1_7. > > our PCI slot has Intel Bandon Beach NIC. > > > > > > Can anyone please let me know, whether the below api's are supported > > in the NIC type [8086:155d] > > > > int rte_eth_dev_bypass_init (uint8_t port) > > > > * int rte_eth_dev_bypass_state_show (uint8_t port, uint32_t _state) > > > > * int rte_eth_dev_bypass_state_set (uint8_t port, uint32_t _new_state) > > > > * int rte_eth_dev_bypass_event_show (uint8_t port, uint32_t event, > > uint32_t _state) > > > > * int rte_eth_dev_bypass_event_store (uint8_t port, uint32_t event, > > uint32_t state) > > > > * int rte_eth_dev_bypass_ver_show (uint8_t port, uint32_t _ver) > > > > * int rte_eth_dev_bypass_wd_timeout_show (uint8_t port, > > > > > > thanks > > Sharath > > >