From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sharathjm.bharadwaj@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-bk0-x22b.google.com (mail-bk0-x22b.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::22b])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0348D58EB
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:19:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-bk0-f43.google.com with SMTP id mx11so1396760bkb.30
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 03:20:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=RSISZne88WNVO7Zn4MbgUMGBhMRtoIlF+74QzaMwU60=;
 b=E5wY3Ic8fhgkwnU4SA8ybYBGHO//oLBd/VKtIoUcposadAN7WPZvy8qHRl81VYHvMb
 JbVR0yCKnD94f3auws+dIjcugoIsHgkgIBCMdb4eimzopc1v3bP7Xe9QCfztnZ3tsiVL
 k0zMKYwt01+XTVbvgv7MyZ9xJ2sy9qX6QerbqcjLRlnlnTT9UiY0jHHvz2YS32O2VpuT
 sH1YAo4Qzdq460BLHhXIQn9mW30jW9ZJKwB4xctQIr1+1OlsWnzyxG0EKS5O8OM1yR5n
 bEKMePAT6JzGprzOAs62Ria46CCZ+KaTw4R8IAGpvswdms9M/NQc6Z1g5E/ccjdAYt07
 lARQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.204.235.9 with SMTP id ke9mr5368582bkb.9.1391080845692; Thu,
 30 Jan 2014 03:20:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.197.208 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 03:20:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ6BMtAF7WT5A+R2xLkHo_eAZZzqqFArkijcp=9S49Z-zYvNLw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJ6BMtCtcsLQux5zT8h2Ah67CGXhGsdfXEC8U=37OqsdLtY6Ow@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+8v-JyXuuEBs0yj=s0pec6hZ_N=AYiXBgK+5yUhXb-KhDqBgQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ6BMtAF7WT5A+R2xLkHo_eAZZzqqFArkijcp=9S49Z-zYvNLw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:50:45 +0530
Message-ID: <CAJ6BMtC-HZzje_ipqWYUAH_miYeFm+cqtb-gwO_XAewzExo2SA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sharath <sharathjm.bharadwaj@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Kaminsky <daniel.kaminsky@infinitelocality.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] checking packet drop at NIC
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:19:27 -0000

hi!

are there any interrupts which are raised by DPDK, for the fifo errors.

please let me know, where can I find the details and how to handle such
interrupts ?

Tx
-SB


On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Sharath <sharathjm.bharadwaj@gmail.com>wrote:

> Thanks Daniel !
> Let me check it out . . .
> On Jan 29, 2014 8:54 PM, "Daniel Kaminsky" <
> daniel.kaminsky@infinitelocality.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Sharath,
>>
>> Try rte_eth_stats_get, I think this should give you what you're looking
>> for.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Sharath <sharathjm.bharadwaj@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> hi !
>>>
>>> can someone please tell me whether the DPDK provides any method to handle
>>> below
>>>
>>> a. account the packet drops at NIC level ? is there any interrupt raised
>>> by
>>> DPDK for the same ?
>>> b. to check fifo errors ?
>>> c. way to check rx and tx in sync
>>>
>>> Tx,
>>> -SB
>>>
>>
>>