From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-bk0-x231.google.com (mail-bk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::231]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 325D858EB for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 08:24:57 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-bk0-f49.google.com with SMTP id v15so1963296bkz.22 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 23:26:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=3UifXpYj4uWXj1r3vJyPZb/tm5+6AqCzii38IR1ybbY=; b=jABVgpsRmas238oROCk2Fj9lFJfjavCxLiKWnjU+59baB1ihsE6qS/NLpDGypHi36f Y/rMxDkFnm11+QEtkFLFuQwn8Fv81zRQtUUgH/hP1WyE6//EJF7VP0GZHUjoxVeiIXqL Btl0C0odoJJBXTWqWZNOvAzMGNcuUFAJwkO+Fk+npbGix67KzHhtQY/2pNc5x9ryAYp2 oVzCKzIoWdDOaGShYmcEykhJOH3jBmiM7A/Po1abB1AevQjlHn6ke6GAq8L8nc7bKvEs 2MKGfGfDzDFNvkyDF3drGU2iQSd9Db9K9am6zTLYG5kOHIW27n6aeJJzWtrRTFESAlve STbg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.205.35.199 with SMTP id sx7mr15790bkb.32.1391153176205; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 23:26:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.197.208 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 23:26:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 12:56:16 +0530 Message-ID: From: Sharath To: Vladimir Medvedkin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] checking packet drop at NIC X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 07:24:57 -0000 thank you Vladimir. On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Vladimir Medvedkin wrote: > Hi Sharath, > > In DPDK interrupts are disabled to eliminate the performance overhead. > Interrupts used only for link status change. So you can poll > rte_eth_stats_get and check struct rte_eth_stats for errors. > > Regards, > Vladimir > > > > 2014-01-31 Sharath > > Hi Daniel & all, >> >> can anyone please let me know about this. >> >> Tx >> -SB >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sharath > >wrote: >> >> > hi! >> > >> > are there any interrupts which are raised by DPDK, for the fifo errors. >> > >> > please let me know, where can I find the details and how to handle such >> > interrupts ? >> > >> > Tx >> > -SB >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Sharath > >wrote: >> > >> >> Thanks Daniel ! >> >> Let me check it out . . . >> >> On Jan 29, 2014 8:54 PM, "Daniel Kaminsky" < >> >> daniel.kaminsky@infinitelocality.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi Sharath, >> >>> >> >>> Try rte_eth_stats_get, I think this should give you what you're >> looking >> >>> for. >> >>> >> >>> Regards, >> >>> Daniel >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Sharath < >> sharathjm.bharadwaj@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> hi ! >> >>>> >> >>>> can someone please tell me whether the DPDK provides any method to >> >>>> handle >> >>>> below >> >>>> >> >>>> a. account the packet drops at NIC level ? is there any interrupt >> >>>> raised by >> >>>> DPDK for the same ? >> >>>> b. to check fifo errors ? >> >>>> c. way to check rx and tx in sync >> >>>> >> >>>> Tx, >> >>>> -SB >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> > >> > >