DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hurd <stephen.hurd@broadcom.com>
To: "Qiu, Michael" <michael.qiu@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Carl Tung <carl.tung@broadcom.com>,
	David Christensen <david.christensen@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] New driver (large patch) question.
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:40:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ9nmBZKFp5rjdZK9hFL8wxT5eic3nu4DiNc30Fh8iYitXDhJw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <533710CFB86FA344BFBF2D6802E6028622F5BCE5@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>

Unfortunately no.

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Qiu, Michael <michael.qiu@intel.com> wrote:

> On 3/3/2016 7:11 AM, Stephen Hurd wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Thomas Monjalon <
> thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>> The comments in it are the only publicly available
> >>> documentation on the hardware I'm aware of.
> >> So you must keep the comments.
> >>
> > That's my goal, but the comments are well over the 300k limit.
> >
> >
> >>> The driver itself doesn't have a lot of optional features in it, it's
> the
> >>> header file that's too big.
> >> It is big because there are many different things.
> >> You can split the file in different patches.
> >> Examples:
> >>         - a patch for RSS will bring the hardware structures for RSS
> >>         - a patch for the stats will bring the hardware stats structures
> >>         etc
> >>
> > Should I split additional definitions/documentation that's not currently
> > used in the driver as well?  Or should it stay as only enough to document
> > what the driver already does?
> >
> > The header file is expected to be publicly released in the future, so I
> > tried to keep it as close to the original as possible.  I'm not strongly
> > attached to this approach, but it does make it easier to support future
> > firmware releases.
> >
> > It's a fairly work-intensive project to deconstruct the existing driver
> > into a series of small patches that work at each step, is this a hard
> > requirement? (if so, I'd better get cracking)
>
> Does original header file has it's own commit log(like it in other
> project)? If yes, it could make your life simpler.
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
> > PS: please answer inline
> > Sorry, $work just switched us to GMail and I'm still learning the ropes.
> >
>
>


-- 
Stephen Hurd
Principal Engineer - Software Development
Broadcom Corporation
949-926-8039
stephen.hurd@broadcom.com

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-03 19:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAJ9nmBaWh8WsuzQcAfrebjaFNYSGsGxEd5Y5DQfWTPuxYY8XWQ@mail.gmail.com>
2016-03-02 10:21 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-02 16:24   ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-02 21:30     ` Stephen Hurd
2016-03-02 21:54       ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-02 22:06         ` Stephen Hurd
2016-03-02 22:12           ` Wiles, Keith
2016-03-02 22:15           ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-02 23:10             ` Stephen Hurd
2016-03-03  0:29               ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-03  1:04                 ` Stephen Hurd
2016-03-03  5:53               ` Qiu, Michael
2016-03-03 19:40                 ` Stephen Hurd [this message]
2016-03-02 23:07       ` Vincent JARDIN
2016-03-02 23:43         ` Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJ9nmBZKFp5rjdZK9hFL8wxT5eic3nu4DiNc30Fh8iYitXDhJw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=stephen.hurd@broadcom.com \
    --cc=carl.tung@broadcom.com \
    --cc=david.christensen@broadcom.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=michael.qiu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).