From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vs1-f46.google.com (mail-vs1-f46.google.com [209.85.217.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114AC1B5EF for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 15:55:40 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-vs1-f46.google.com with SMTP id e7so10166022vsc.2 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 06:55:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZKgECuhiN7Cp4DCK5nk+CPUUjM/ESV4gL/PKL/VtGss=; b=QclZ37K/yl6oo3hFc5ilhd4hJtCXlOd1f/2s5EJk+AiZJPmE4r4tNLYdzMKH2IfGoe CXNJkNp4osOEwL1Pw7acHm79oGmFPIyCniCIf9YrPJHN8V1c9K2EMYq2zl3f3P8qT9Uf iTre63tRLOrfb4iKyRYROlrmOAAoYASglEv6iOsR3ZDizGSMi406MO9pW4EEyQEowbEN ftqQcDKdiiNYUbe4mpCtQJFymFAbooUT9rRA8UZ4RLkQsNWADE+VaknVPSLkYGMqIw44 ssVrdE2yrc6Yvf6ORrvHRvScYN8rmMbvVfZ0cxQeQQxzsiQJ4uf9jKEmxZ/ErlPAxXB9 zo4w== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbCEB0OHUMitY6+8s1mjsShC3WhIT+yhcQ45fguW1ASfm+jErJX t+hJGPlUdrKUt1nd09dH3KaZloRVwKzmUSD6QEyEpg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/Uh+4mu8xPGI4zeBWHkuJM/pQ4igTtSm66H8IYcihIEYTALiM03AYjBQktgi4UM12mPQyaydKCQJUP5UtmRjeI= X-Received: by 2002:a67:c48a:: with SMTP id d10mr1991025vsk.105.1545144939331; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 06:55:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1545141782-31841-1-git-send-email-arnon@qwilt.com> <20602834.ZYhc1qxlTj@xps> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 15:55:28 +0100 Message-ID: To: Arnon Warshavsky Cc: Thomas Monjalon , dev@dpdk.org, "Yigit, Ferruh" , Ajit Khaparde Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] devtools: fix error propagation from check-forbidden-tokens.awk X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:55:40 -0000 On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 3:54 PM Arnon Warshavsky wrote: > No need for all those checks on $? and the output saving. >> > > You blew my cover guys. I am not a shell scripts person :) > You are right. WIll change that > Eheh, I am looking at shell scripts at the same time... hence the quick replies ;-) -- David Marchand