From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF017A0A05; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:14:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60277140DE2; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:14:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FB8140DBF for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:14:12 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1611058451; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=wQSJeZGSuSG88m49Hv7ZdsZTBbJbOnQszS2DGyC61uQ=; b=fQhN7xO04UGtHyIFJ/jxf1frosXSFmPjvTEcndppcVOLdAEy3apRXyuxGCovy0or3VMKVj OYQOMo9Eb6USzQsSPuPtqGdb9QTBaEmJgbuk8joaxQn+ckqJad7WH6nnTznbpK5+RYm0nM mRDoQ1nj0kz/xRXwSqCTL+yaLKLljoI= Received: from mail-vs1-f72.google.com (mail-vs1-f72.google.com [209.85.217.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-599-9xefO9VJMduC6lSEzsIxEQ-1; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 07:14:10 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 9xefO9VJMduC6lSEzsIxEQ-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f72.google.com with SMTP id h19so3567151vso.11 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 04:14:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wQSJeZGSuSG88m49Hv7ZdsZTBbJbOnQszS2DGyC61uQ=; b=ZyWHWsdx0wxudCUIsrGoaSQtvHORDqJ3jQs4BtyzFH0b9K9Q86t2Gs7FzG8pSnSuix lNVTH5tfrL0ji+LkvwGSOy5fCM6mgsFM45G+8mdrqGxqevJjPtP2uL1TAUfr0+DrFH7y +P80H/8AGqep/quolJ71M0N/JPucjMgNGWqJvwwaRqRtb4ofe8a++NrzFV+H9UEj5i2j dV8SwHj5ljvpJLUBwnlewk4ozGWyrCPF4v+O9yyv6XoGY4Pqi+dXPcshLPhw/IbvPpKI KqVMIiPv3kuq2VGk/8sg1hTJ9bGob4J6eCBMSevEVRShrSASP3occvgLLfWykZccJxGK vYbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Mz+iwkmhslW2qoGUpr3B310r+F4ZqNdsu5AwYqSdaMGOrzw5B jynFUp5xkvBXcZoNvoJGjvewZ7aM+qO8uMZqUYg9c1esAflQWum25UGm/o2JcmDyHYX0Ufc+HM4 CBkCoO2A9cnh/5oFb20E= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:3246:: with SMTP id y67mr2176031vky.9.1611058449658; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 04:14:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzACc5ksrTH+yPUaECMxrvkH3GE8qbjYJCK5nXP1Om8FzgBvJdmlYuYEUa0OjoSw1is+A5aK1cwnkALbf56iT8= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:3246:: with SMTP id y67mr2176025vky.9.1611058449426; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 04:14:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <11a0d8735a3ee33d02bc57dc702995486051f5d6.1605022892.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:13:58 +0100 Message-ID: To: Anatoly Burakov Cc: dev , michallinuxstuff@gmail.com Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.02] eal/linux: improve no hugepages logging X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:17 PM David Marchand wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 4:41 PM Anatoly Burakov > wrote: > > > > When no hugepages are found, we log a message about it, but we never > > specify on which node. We also implicitly declare the page size based > > on the directory name, but that's not very user friendly. > > > > Fix both by changing the text of the message to note the NUMA node (if > > applicable) and explicitly mention page size in kilobytes. > > > Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov > Reviewed-by: David Marchand Applied. -- David Marchand