From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524FAA00E6
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Mon,  8 Jul 2019 10:26:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14EAE3195;
	Mon,  8 Jul 2019 10:26:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-vs1-f66.google.com (mail-vs1-f66.google.com
 [209.85.217.66]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC942F42
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  8 Jul 2019 10:26:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-vs1-f66.google.com with SMTP id k9so7639287vso.5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 01:26:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=HzbhskgI7qYHstLT8CG3+4nz9d00qaRSRXh0ObTVkv0=;
 b=bV18GN3GEMuKQHapCgt0loUaA1qkDwTwGJwaD/dZhfx1WwoGwkNCXTGeTG9UJoyApe
 ualajG6muUMM6fZLxOoGQpw/n8nAJDt89HjsSz3xFvYgKE9nIrElMyQQEnFBsNrN+O0L
 bUbGf309Hqx+voUdAKtDjagaZuzf5btucWyo7K6bu4l/NEzS2e1JqGZ+Y9nrpntKnA6U
 eu1FauCq99c/eFmLZM2A/qy6qbuOmf5Eyew5HMU3A015gHZNBIqpZg4Yh67x2u2+nbZA
 R/wiBpe22qqWzt/UednmQS3MSQp04R7Sy1DFHuaO10E46WVZ9gSFJTfafkfDZLrEPJkv
 YiSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVySKHLZ6pWOgXIZprvcB1U7iAMkJsuHodW5ytrDX2rrt3UA2Es
 wgjZWV+ZQvwvnc50fGeSpKgMwgiP7bZHKsuuJGFjgw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwwXybWUhgXxwPY8lTj0SYyk2W5WZ1Spd2R47E53XZMmFpag6G3I9vdVTFoyGudxGgJqjraEj0wrT3lN2Bu6CA=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:da99:: with SMTP id w25mr9606814vsj.141.1562574389875; 
 Mon, 08 Jul 2019 01:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190707155705.58515-1-xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190707155705.58515-1-xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 10:26:18 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8w6T_pB+M-AAoqu0b7hgWUo7DQE8s-TB8t4jF-PRNqD9Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Cc: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
 dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/af_xdp: correct xdp frame size
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 10:03 AM Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com> wrote:

> XSK_UMEM__DEFAULT_FRAME_SIZE has been changed to 4096 in kernel commit
> 123e8da1d330 (xsk: Change the default frame size to 4096 and allow
> controlling it), but we still need to keep ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE as 2048 to
> fit most dpdk apps.
>

I might have missed something, but can't you use the mbuf size from the
packet mempool passed at rx_queue_setup?


-- 
David Marchand