From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (xvm-189-124.dc0.ghst.net [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A92A0524; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 14:45:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A1C140F64; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 14:45:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BEAB140F54 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 14:45:32 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1610027132; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=I4tmzDBYtKk6lCI2WCGluW0UzHfK96iaITp5GlH7uks=; b=SPRacZxHTg5LKRuEB0PakD2nhQMRpUSWQCX3Zejs5Ua6Ijil5efwFaqp9n/Hi+IUKkL77B 6siqXQaBkTSsx0kklOvKN3kFJVNwBT+HoHtBLFqacRJh9rsfmGtPAp7CUkyZecWYzIUBDe NmiB5jPZtqoZX3VUDj1GOoHSHJuk2vY= Received: from mail-vk1-f197.google.com (mail-vk1-f197.google.com [209.85.221.197]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-336-gCwEjXhSMOmYgBI9LblEiA-1; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 08:45:29 -0500 X-MC-Unique: gCwEjXhSMOmYgBI9LblEiA-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f197.google.com with SMTP id m20so3548767vkk.16 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 05:45:28 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=I4tmzDBYtKk6lCI2WCGluW0UzHfK96iaITp5GlH7uks=; b=q7mv6aoX+tLIamQzVekCEn5ika4TboX9ttdW/27PVHQxzCWU7fYhEgT/2Bkpidk/Vp x9aq1IIPzldXvrOjCFMRknHAkOzqHehoiu38/gcOibc196aJuamF7NmBjh7N9gvzg6/R WDcJY34JSpSv6bvqDtNPrmpNJRWsT1qkbA1g4nC/jJQfGxM8ngp2W+RoGCBeHXRxkaPN CQq0SbdzjFpG867zj738tdmVDZOYJUkXt4wqvRtKaDMxZaKB37JlV3K10+qmWfNo8kQJ zh55Q7cSq/Ouy7dOiv+2Mcr+xY0cwvXu+zdn+uJv2T21UAl8GMDYwY6b6VHj290NhPEi VIjg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532kpYWV7deYyGzuog038nRXah2W1i/lJfZwI3RDq4w5U8xQkb/7 wEf4mHsUxKStU+l2+huV8c6pmm7Xlfc/L/71RPn+ZeMr4GuRsXORVpdeEl1iE2tYUnon/R4Q9OK Y0ZRC/o0mNMNTGk0Ozis= X-Received: by 2002:a67:3212:: with SMTP id y18mr7038081vsy.5.1610027128551; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 05:45:28 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxmrtyIMcTgXA9ZtQ/yilB7wVaoEEp5D0Be69XBZ0C0xsmd/1z7gOv+TX4dqRfOyR7RXsjVfCYM97jCuwCebcg= X-Received: by 2002:a67:3212:: with SMTP id y18mr7038067vsy.5.1610027128353; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 05:45:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201216085854.7842-1-jia.guo@intel.com> <1693993.jziF1hSf6E@thomas> <27289607.Vi9ZVq1Shk@thomas> In-Reply-To: <27289607.Vi9ZVq1Shk@thomas> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 14:45:17 +0100 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: "Guo, Jia" , "Zhang, Qi Z" , "Wu, Jingjing" , "Yang, Qiming" , "Wang, Haiyue" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Yigit, Ferruh" , "andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru" , "orika@nvidia.com" , "getelson@nvidia.com" , Dodji Seketeli Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-dev v2 1/2] ethdev: add new tunnel type for ecpri X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:33 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Yes that may break the ABI but fortunately the checking-abi-compatibility tool shows negative :) , thanks Ferruh' s guide. > > https://github.com/ferruhy/dpdk/actions/runs/468859673 > > That's very strange. An enum value is changed. > Why it is not flagged by libabigail? I suspect this is because the enum is not referenced in any object... all I see is an integer with a comment that it should be filled with values from the enum. -- David Marchand