From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E706445547; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 11:31:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB15740666; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 11:31:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2734065A for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 11:31:30 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1719912689; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oa+06U78wndGpYtplfzpSWlMF31OJfOvYdGxfEZRrDM=; b=LwpQ4/YW9DjjijeKNFvSaBbSkB60XUbTcQ4qGQdQ9NxPkE1heQZEDJL9PoY9j5eTYzQN1m LByPHsfT/aZ+4iD2IOkito/nMXqUytpmn6MBA+lt6QscMtcsOdZw+PgSX74/HIxI5DZeA0 EQZHo2gFIhElGcUHnvmdkZbYBEbUTy0= Received: from mail-pj1-f71.google.com (mail-pj1-f71.google.com [209.85.216.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-653-oGTqzuNAPcurhyuQk78IwA-1; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 05:31:28 -0400 X-MC-Unique: oGTqzuNAPcurhyuQk78IwA-1 Received: by mail-pj1-f71.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2c965f8f813so131861a91.2 for ; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 02:31:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1719912687; x=1720517487; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oa+06U78wndGpYtplfzpSWlMF31OJfOvYdGxfEZRrDM=; b=u8c21+hw79//Ma9u9YXClxkJolHaG07TyEOtMoLWn+TyO9QwBSn5g/5iZl1v2ZJHCP ljCO27Zp/H6zxx54dnTrey58nMKRutmfkVUP2RyB1nLWQ9hS2ferqjjnwigJZ3Rba9GK qMV/heFgKLMAZpAeipAlY1YFuPeksSFTvT0qhtVByb7FaBfyxs7ytRMgw7DxkJHWOaLj TkA25Nx9BEIdL9QHOWSWXxcGGxpEihWG0gkCal1M905z5PwU2f5M/DeENDHkTaH2SiQ6 xZWaXCKfSoxXAAi8mMbBshJHqr1AV49qgxEAOIufXvg2qwMkbUCCvsxAvfd9YsI6U2d6 jpzA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWJafG9rxqahaYe+iYfD4J0zPCGlfqHNN1xbt0SvjKSSByDkGsfVM0aSsj8ETOpcpnRyKobfYO4UcBnUtM= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxJ1FRIbabDUBCvyhQN/yUEuLurmNwGILISTawS9vD9eQ7c1IJu LX+leYV7myyjOLEJOBa+Ks8KoTBdbNkwvqHyAbmr3LiKpEvGFuWBUwPRRHt39C+hqbYtAzFYlit xluuA4YreW8epvQiwVOrrpOUCtPMSqAZqnNUyWmUD01RV19hU4BfZB0+FRTI065GjPhXtvZBfEq 3y4vX1gK4U3lOq2Xk= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4a4f:b0:2c8:50ed:5544 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2c93d6db0a2mr4812096a91.1.1719912687618; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 02:31:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFdC0PRKsU0kT3lRYW3me6+6pTY+X6ipHHpyPVKd+0TKQB5uFUMYrYuNa+1PP3vVJz0rN3D0/edGmwYtlyFxVA= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4a4f:b0:2c8:50ed:5544 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2c93d6db0a2mr4812084a91.1.1719912687297; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 02:31:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230215102905.22767-1-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> <20230215102905.22767-2-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> <10101166.0AQdONaE2F@thomas> <2f98a10d-0be8-5164-b213-97553ea76209@oss.nxp.com> In-Reply-To: <2f98a10d-0be8-5164-b213-97553ea76209@oss.nxp.com> From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 11:31:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drivers: replace printf with fprintf for debug functions To: hemant.agrawal@nxp.com Cc: Thomas Monjalon , dev@dpdk.org X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Hello Hemant, On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:28=E2=80=AFAM Hemant Agrawal wrote: > On 15-Feb-23 8:46 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 15/02/2023 11:29, Hemant Agrawal: > >> This patch replaces simple printf with fprintf for debug dump > >> related functions for various NXP dpaaX related drivers. > > Why replacing with fprintf(stdout)? > > > > Would it be better to provide a FILE* parameter to the functions? > yes, I will update. Any news for this series? At least a rebase is needed, I marked it as changes requested. --=20 David Marchand