From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA96424C3;
	Tue, 11 Jun 2024 17:15:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D27D40A73;
	Tue, 11 Jun 2024 17:15:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com
 (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8FF40A67
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 17:15:42 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
 s=mimecast20190719; t=1718118942;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=vhwcWZ+h22g9CdIxLCqh/QJDSrxorrZ9KMdL6Fw3e64=;
 b=ZxOIpj981SUjLcGYeRbca6LdlELtPpwaq2lxo/BKtQu/wuDbIfERz05f8pF6ve+72H4Hvz
 cELRmVMoHb3FwxhnMfZW3SY/5jb0oY29TYhyzwlbRJvkJbL5KIcm6rWP9HEsh5O+SxjGmL
 NRhDWcLTXUflp6BrG2GchJvbOfBJ6oU=
Received: from mail-lj1-f198.google.com (mail-lj1-f198.google.com
 [209.85.208.198]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS
 (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
 us-mta-649-f36mre86PHyMVCY3-uuo2A-1; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:15:39 -0400
X-MC-Unique: f36mre86PHyMVCY3-uuo2A-1
Received: by mail-lj1-f198.google.com with SMTP id
 38308e7fff4ca-2ebea1c1124so10954331fa.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 08:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718118937; x=1718723737;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from
 :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
 :subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=vhwcWZ+h22g9CdIxLCqh/QJDSrxorrZ9KMdL6Fw3e64=;
 b=fbNYKDZ41TiLMMuXF5iUSU6CueSNn6c3zxcaLkXIiIfjY3sZCbhRuI0PJh7SAoHpmB
 TddYCsK5QOOUPkL3D3jx+J1+w8frPsDrTfzwCbNVFT6TrGUTp4PNrqTrAtPA/OcCOL2K
 5MW/LTTEGhOrU85XlDvo0pyq2J844ZtO6B/vz7t3Bxnaa3xRVjg3BCbhfQrLZo3DbksX
 wH6otHnL/pUA8wk6IQ5fxMvpUkkI7tcy1bQBY125xzrx+L3TR6XniF9TqdLrqRb83v53
 PGT7ELvsqfDlwN9+dSp+MO1v759xJLu8KgHVS3/RyunBvn1v3IZMusWDWuIs7PlfPEWj
 cUZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwHnL4C2FDTgn91/V73Kxe60aP/+tHf2xDdYugJ76NNP03N/cu+
 z20Nc75CtNmvLiNxxSk2k050IDHbBUJj1mgOOfBD4VW+A6/DLPWSIJ/Ka2gsff3MdxairtBzGi4
 /4wzQx4coR0Hgi9NWvKCr1twy4CbblWii3k1OrzHyNC9cbVWoqjySmaGGR7FbMyeyJZl5IGCj+j
 CjQ4wwz9Pzmq4LOXU=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:91d0:0:b0:2eb:d924:43fb with SMTP id
 38308e7fff4ca-2ebd924456dmr63762811fa.41.1718118937698; 
 Tue, 11 Jun 2024 08:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEBIe26FqJNJR6QFbEAgsRIWTVfEKRqSGvnlYxBbUW14Kk/FAUZE7J1RRcmW+S9HYJrvEaAmwuraH+HNV7jSzk=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:91d0:0:b0:2eb:d924:43fb with SMTP id
 38308e7fff4ca-2ebd924456dmr63762611fa.41.1718118937344; Tue, 11 Jun 2024
 08:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1706134657-17446-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
 <1709756036-24068-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <1709756036-24068-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 17:15:25 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8w=_aLanaicxmCAmrzXX9Ar-y8cKaaC1Jtuz3ztKAbZag@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] more replacement of zero length array
To: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, 
 Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>, 
 Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>,
 Sameh Gobriel <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>, 
 Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>,
 Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>, 
 mb@smartsharesystems.com, fengchengwen@huawei.com
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org

On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 9:14=E2=80=AFPM Tyler Retzlaff
<roretzla@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> Replace some missed zero length arrays not captured in the
> original series.
> https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D30410&state=3D*
>
> Zero length arrays are a GNU extension that has been
> superseded by flex arrays.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
>
> v5:
>   * no changes, rebase for upstream merge / conflicts.
>
> v4:
>   * add another temporary suppression of libabigail bug
>     for rte_rcu_qsbr. As with pipeline i cannot see that
>     rte_rcu_qsbr is nested in any other struct.
>
> v3:
>   * add temporary suppression of libabigail bug
>     https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D31377
>   * add 2 more patches covering lpm and table
>     (series ack has not been extended)
>   * add another zero length array missed in rcu and pipeline
>
> v2:
>   * added additional patches for fib & pipeline libs.
>     series-acks have been placed only against original
>     hash and rcu patches.
>
> Tyler Retzlaff (6):
>   hash: replace zero length array with flex array
>   rcu: replace zero length array with flex array
>   fib: replace zero length array with flex array
>   pipeline: replace zero length array with flex array
>   lpm: replace zero length array with flex array
>   table: replace zero length array with flex array
>
>  devtools/libabigail.abignore      | 5 +++++
>  lib/fib/dir24_8.h                 | 2 +-
>  lib/fib/trie.h                    | 2 +-
>  lib/hash/rte_thash.c              | 4 ++--
>  lib/lpm/rte_lpm6.c                | 2 +-
>  lib/pipeline/rte_pipeline.h       | 2 +-
>  lib/pipeline/rte_port_in_action.c | 2 +-
>  lib/rcu/rcu_qsbr_pvt.h            | 2 +-
>  lib/rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h            | 2 +-
>  lib/table/rte_table_acl.c         | 2 +-
>  lib/table/rte_table_array.c       | 2 +-
>  lib/table/rte_table_hash_cuckoo.c | 2 +-
>  lib/table/rte_table_hash_ext.c    | 2 +-
>  lib/table/rte_table_hash_key16.c  | 2 +-
>  lib/table/rte_table_hash_key32.c  | 2 +-
>  lib/table/rte_table_hash_key8.c   | 2 +-
>  lib/table/rte_table_hash_lru.c    | 2 +-
>  lib/table/rte_table_lpm.c         | 2 +-
>  lib/table/rte_table_lpm_ipv6.c    | 2 +-
>  19 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

libabigail 2.5 got released.
I had a try with it in GHA, and the false positive errors around
lib/pipeline and lib/rcu are gone.
Yet there may still be people using older version, so let's take this
series as is with the temporary exceptions.

Series applied, thanks.


--=20
David Marchand