From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] test/bpf: fix auto-test with clang fails
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 20:46:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8wD_NY46XR_QrCFVQ5okRFNeaamGY10k7au5a+m-ME4gA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211018085847.2cb4ddc6@hermes.local>
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 5:59 PM Stephen Hemminger
<stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> wrote:
> > test_shift1_check() function fails with clang build.
> > The reason for that is that clang uses 64-bit shift instruction for
> > what expected to be 32-bit operation.
> > To be more specific, this C code:
> > r2 = (uint32_t)r2 >> r4;
> > With clang produces:
> > 41a4eb: 48 d3 ef shr %cl,%rdi
> > In that particular case it is an allowed choice, as from one side
> > left-operand value is known to fit into 32 bits, from other side
> > according to 'C' standard:
> > "...if the value of the right operand is negative or is greater than
> > or equal to the width of the promoted left operand, the behavior is
> > undefined."
> > The problem is that on x86 behavior for 64-bit and 32-bit shift
> > operation might differ.
> > The fix avoids undefined behavior by making sure
> > that right operand will not exceed width of the promoted left operand.
> >
> > Bugzilla ID: 811
> > Fixes: 9f8f9d91a701 ("test/bpf: introduce functional test")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Reported-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Applied, thanks.
Probably worth adding bpf_autotest in the fast-tests list.
There are other missing tests in this list, for my todolist unless
someone wants to look at it.
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-20 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-18 13:40 [dpdk-dev] " Konstantin Ananyev
2021-10-18 15:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-10-20 18:46 ` David Marchand [this message]
2021-10-20 20:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJFAV8wD_NY46XR_QrCFVQ5okRFNeaamGY10k7au5a+m-ME4gA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).