From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>,
Jens Freimann <jfreimann@redhat.com>,
Zhihong Wang <zhihong.wang@intel.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] vhost: I-cache pressure optimizations
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 15:04:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8wF6p4h8R3+KZ3Ldr2QtV+3MfRLHrpOJ4dw+DSziRqpUQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190517122220.31283-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 2:23 PM Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
wrote:
> Some OVS-DPDK PVP benchmarks show a performance drop
> when switching from DPDK v17.11 to v18.11.
>
> With the addition of packed ring layout support,
> rte_vhost_enqueue_burst and rte_vhost_dequeue_burst
> became very large, and only a part of the instructions
> are executed (either packed or split ring used).
>
> This series aims at improving the I-cache pressure,
> first by un-inlining split and packed rings, but
> also by moving parts considered as cold in dedicated
> functions (dirty page logging, fragmented descriptors
> buffer management added for CVE-2018-1059).
>
> With the series applied, size of the enqueue and
> dequeue split paths is reduced significantly:
>
> +---------+--------------------+---------------------+
> | Version | Enqueue split path | Dequeue split path |
> +---------+--------------------+---------------------+
> | v19.05 | 16461B | 25521B |
> | +series | 7286B | 11285B |
> +---------+--------------------+---------------------+
>
> Using perf tool to monitor iTLB-load-misses event
> while doing PVP benchmark with testpmd as vswitch,
> we can see the number of iTLB misses being reduced:
>
> - v19.05:
> # perf stat --repeat 10 -C 2,3 -e iTLB-load-miss -- sleep 10
>
> Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 2,3' (10 runs):
>
> 2,438 iTLB-load-miss
> ( +- 13.43% )
>
> 10.00058928 +- 0.00000336 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.00% )
>
> - +series:
> # perf stat --repeat 10 -C 2,3 -e iTLB-load-miss -- sleep 10
>
> Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 2,3' (10 runs):
>
> 55 iTLB-load-miss
> ( +- 10.08% )
>
> 10.00059466 +- 0.00000283 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.00% )
>
> The series also force the inlining of some rte_memcpy
> helpers, as by adding packed ring support, some of them
> were not more inlined but embedded as functions in
> the virtio_net object file, which was not expected.
>
> Finally, the series simplifies the descriptors buffers
> prefetching, by doing it in the recently introduced
> descriptor buffer mapping function.
>
> Maxime Coquelin (4):
> vhost: un-inline dirty pages logging functions
> vhost: do not inline packed and split functions
> vhost: do not inline unlikely fragmented buffers code
> vhost: simplify descriptor's buffer prefetching
>
> root (1):
> eal/x86: force inlining of all memcpy and mov helpers
>
root ? "oops" :-)
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-17 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-17 12:22 Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-17 12:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] vhost: un-inline dirty pages logging functions Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-17 12:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] vhost: do not inline packed and split functions Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-17 13:00 ` David Marchand
2019-05-17 14:42 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-17 12:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] vhost: do not inline unlikely fragmented buffers code Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-17 12:57 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-21 19:43 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2019-05-23 14:30 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-23 15:17 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2019-05-23 17:40 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-17 12:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] vhost: simplify descriptor's buffer prefetching Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-17 12:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/5] eal/x86: force inlining of all memcpy and mov helpers Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-17 13:04 ` David Marchand [this message]
2019-05-17 14:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] vhost: I-cache pressure optimizations Maxime Coquelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJFAV8wF6p4h8R3+KZ3Ldr2QtV+3MfRLHrpOJ4dw+DSziRqpUQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jfreimann@redhat.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).