DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Gaetan Rivet <grive@u256.net>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/2] pci: explain how empty strings are rejected in DBDF
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 11:18:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8wJ4HzvdHZb_KwWyjY4nFGygwL8yo6LBbGsG602-KCQaw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200513104751.46466-3-grive@u256.net>

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:48 PM Gaetan Rivet <grive@u256.net> wrote:
>
> Empty strings are forbidden as input to rte_pci_addr_parse().
> It is explicitly enforced in BDF parsing as parsing the bus
> field will immediately fail. The related check is commented.
>
> It is implicitly enforced in DBDF parsing, as the domain would be
> parsed to 0 without error, but the check `end[0] != ':'` afterward
> will return -EINVAL.
>
> Enforcing consistency between parsers by reading the code is not helped
> by this property being implicit. Add a comment to explain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gaetan Rivet <grive@u256.net>
Acked-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>


Applied, thanks.

-- 
David Marchand


      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-19  9:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-13 10:47 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/2] pci: a comment and a minor fix Gaetan Rivet
2020-05-13 10:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/2] pci: fix allowing underflow when parsing PCI id Gaetan Rivet
2020-05-14  8:52   ` Stojaczyk, Dariusz
2020-05-19  9:17   ` David Marchand
2020-05-13 10:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/2] pci: explain how empty strings are rejected in DBDF Gaetan Rivet
2020-05-14  8:53   ` Stojaczyk, Dariusz
2020-05-19  9:18   ` David Marchand [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJFAV8wJ4HzvdHZb_KwWyjY4nFGygwL8yo6LBbGsG602-KCQaw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=grive@u256.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).