From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, mukawa@igel.co.jp, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] bus/pci: fix driver detach clear
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 14:03:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8wL=zv7kV+86jdzYT+c340iZAwFcPs1RJvrVoZ66FTFjg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1574243271-27734-1-git-send-email-matan@mellanox.com>
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:48 AM Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com> wrote:
>
> When a rte_device is unplugged, the driver should be detached from the
> device.
>
> The PCI detach driver operation wrongly didn't clear the driver from the
> device structure what remain the device in probe state from the EAL
> point of view.
>
> For example, when a device is removed twice using rte_dev_remove, it
> cause a crash in EAL.
I can see a crash when using port detach in testpmd with a virtio pci device.
testpmd> port attach 0000:07:00.0
Attaching a new port...
EAL: PCI device 0000:07:00.0 on NUMA socket -1
EAL: Invalid NUMA socket, default to 0
EAL: probe driver: 1af4:1041 net_virtio
Port 1 is attached. Now total ports is 2
Done
testpmd> port close 1
Closing ports...
EAL: Releasing pci mapped resource for 0000:07:00.0
EAL: Calling pci_unmap_resource for 0000:07:00.0 at 0x2200006000
Done
testpmd> port detach 1
Removing a device...
Breakpoint 1, local_dev_remove (dev=0x1de64b0) at
/root/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c:315
315 if (dev->bus->unplug == NULL) {
Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install
glibc-2.17-292.el7.x86_64 libgcc-4.8.5-39.el7.x86_64
libpcap-1.5.3-11.el7.x86_64 numactl-libs-2.0.12-3.el7.x86_64
(gdb) p *dev
$1 = {next = {tqe_next = 0x0, tqe_prev = 0x0}, name = 0x1cf8078
"0000:07:00.0", driver = 0x16c68f0 <rte_virtio_pmd+16>, bus =
0x16b2640 <rte_pci_bus>, numa_node = 0, devargs = 0x1cf8060}
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Device of port 1 is detached
Now total ports is 1
Done
On the first detach, the pci bus frees the rte_pci_device which embeds
the rte_device object.
static int
pci_unplug(struct rte_device *dev)
{
struct rte_pci_device *pdev;
int ret;
pdev = RTE_DEV_TO_PCI(dev);
ret = rte_pci_detach_dev(pdev);
if (ret == 0) {
rte_pci_remove_device(pdev);
rte_devargs_remove(dev->devargs);
free(pdev);
}
return ret;
}
testpmd> port detach 1
Removing a device...
Breakpoint 1, local_dev_remove (dev=0x1de64b0) at
/root/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c:315
315 if (dev->bus->unplug == NULL) {
(gdb) p *dev
$2 = {next = {tqe_next = 0x0, tqe_prev = 0x0}, name = 0xa <Address 0xa
out of bounds>, driver = 0x0, bus = 0x4637, numa_node = 1, devargs =
0x40000002e040018}
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00000000007c1ddd in local_dev_remove (dev=0x1de64b0) at
/root/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c:315
315 if (dev->bus->unplug == NULL) {
On the second detach, testpmd passes the same rte_device pointer it
extracts from rte_eth_devices, but the malloc'd location has been
reused (with watchpoint on the location, I found somewhere around
rte_mp_request_sync/opendir()), and then *crunch* on dev->bus.
From my pov:
- testpmd is wrongly reusing a pointer coming from rte_eth_devices[],
without caring about the port state (this is what your second patch
fixes),
- testpmd is directly kicking pointers in rte_eth_devices[] (setting
->device = NULL for its own logic), which is bad too,
- this patch just hides the reuse of a freed pointer,
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-20 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-12 8:47 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] " Matan Azrad
2019-11-12 8:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] app/testpmd: fix invalid port detaching Matan Azrad
2019-11-12 11:20 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-11-20 22:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " David Marchand
2020-01-23 13:19 ` [dpdk-dev] " Yigit, Ferruh
2020-01-23 14:05 ` Matan Azrad
2020-01-23 14:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-23 15:29 ` Matan Azrad
2020-01-23 18:14 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-23 19:25 ` Matan Azrad
2020-01-24 16:28 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-25 18:56 ` Matan Azrad
2020-02-03 15:58 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-02-03 17:10 ` Matan Azrad
2020-02-12 13:49 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-02-13 12:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-02-13 13:36 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-02-13 14:00 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-11-19 22:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/2] bus/pci: fix driver detach clear Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-20 9:02 ` Matan Azrad
2019-11-20 9:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Matan Azrad
2019-11-20 13:03 ` David Marchand [this message]
2019-11-20 13:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Matan Azrad
2019-11-20 13:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-20 17:22 ` David Marchand
2019-11-20 22:52 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJFAV8wL=zv7kV+86jdzYT+c340iZAwFcPs1RJvrVoZ66FTFjg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=matan@mellanox.com \
--cc=mukawa@igel.co.jp \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).