DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	 "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
	"tredaelli@redhat.com" <tredaelli@redhat.com>,
	 "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	amr.mokhtar@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bbdev: add missing experimental tags
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:37:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8wM6NksBF_+j_569oS78SEp_Vd9wr2gNJD7wL5CuDofSg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D3765A8CDB52A4C8B410430AA19CB23709189AF@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com>

Hello Akhil,

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 1:52 PM Mokhtar, Amr <amr.mokhtar@intel.com> wrote:

>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman@tuxdriver.com]
> > Sent: Friday 14 December 2018 12:36
> > To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>; dev@dpdk.org; stable@dpdk.org;
> > tredaelli@redhat.com; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Mokhtar,
> > Amr <amr.mokhtar@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bbdev: add missing experimental tags
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 11:00:17AM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 10:54 AM Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi David,
> > > >
> > > > I can see that there are other APIs as well which are not marked as
> > > > experimental like rte_bbdev_dec_op_alloc_bulk
> > > > rte_bbdev_dec_op_free_bulk, rte_bbdev_enqueue_enc_ops etc.
> > > >
>
> It seems that all APIs defined in rte_bbdev_op.h are missing their
> experimental tags.
>
> > >
> > > Well, that's the problem with inlines...
> > > I don't think we can detect these easily.
> > >
> > We can, if the symbols get added to the version map as they should.  But
> > (as you
> > note), because these functions are inlines, theres no error thrown for
> not
> > following that rule.
> >
>
> Right, there are some APIs missing in the map file.
> I am submitting a patch of those functions missing.
>

Sorry, did not follow up on this.
My patch has been marked as "Changes Requested" in pw but Amr volunteered
to fix those issues.

How do we proceed, do you want a single fix ? or you can already pick mine.


-- 
David Marchand

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-18 10:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-04 20:57 David Marchand
2018-12-05 12:23 ` Neil Horman
2018-12-05 16:46 ` Mokhtar, Amr
2018-12-14  9:54 ` Akhil Goyal
2018-12-14 10:00   ` David Marchand
2018-12-14 12:35     ` Neil Horman
2018-12-14 12:52       ` Mokhtar, Amr
2018-12-18 10:37         ` David Marchand [this message]
2018-12-18 10:43           ` Akhil Goyal
2018-12-18 10:48             ` David Marchand
2018-12-19  9:20               ` Mokhtar, Amr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJFAV8wM6NksBF_+j_569oS78SEp_Vd9wr2gNJD7wL5CuDofSg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
    --cc=amr.mokhtar@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=tredaelli@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).