DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>,
	 Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>,
	Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>,
	 David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	 "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/ppc: fix redefine bool type
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:04:26 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8wS0oVbG6X7Cb7AWQ92wdSL0KNZHtHZ7rMvYJcPgHz6-Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM6PR05MB51760427139B7676174127F3DBAA0@AM6PR05MB5176.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 10:53 AM Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com> wrote:
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/ppc/include/rte_memcpy.h
> > b/lib/librte_eal/ppc/include/rte_memcpy.h
> > > index 25311ba..d234e21 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/ppc/include/rte_memcpy.h
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/ppc/include/rte_memcpy.h
> > > @@ -8,13 +8,12 @@
> > >
> > >  #include <stdint.h>
> > >  #include <string.h>
> > > -/*To include altivec.h, GCC version must  >= 4.8 */
> > > -#include <altivec.h>
> >
> > Why move the inclusion under the __cplusplus check?
> >
> Just to make it in the same part as other rte includes.

"Normal" rte includes are usually standalone and "#ifdef __cplusplus" safe.
The rte_altivec.h header you added does not need any "#ifdef
__cplusplus" protection, but it might later).

But otoh, "generic/" headers are special/internal headers and this is
why generic/rte_memcpy.h is under this check.

So if there is no reason on your side, please leave rte_altivec.h
inclusion at the same place as the previous altivec.h.


Thanks.

-- 
David Marchand


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-30  9:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-28  7:58 Ori Kam
2020-04-28 18:20 ` David Christensen
2020-04-30  8:54   ` Ori Kam
2020-04-29  8:17 ` David Marchand
2020-04-30  8:53   ` Ori Kam
2020-04-30  9:04     ` David Marchand [this message]
2020-04-30  9:06       ` Ori Kam
2020-04-30 14:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Ori Kam
2020-04-30 19:41   ` David Christensen
2020-05-03  6:34     ` Raslan Darawsheh
2020-05-03  7:31       ` Matan Azrad
2020-05-06  9:41   ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJFAV8wS0oVbG6X7Cb7AWQ92wdSL0KNZHtHZ7rMvYJcPgHz6-Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=matan@mellanox.com \
    --cc=orika@mellanox.com \
    --cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=viacheslavo@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git