From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64BCA0C4B; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:52:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D190D41166; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:52:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0647B40041 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:52:28 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1634287948; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=d6IfoHV3doIzC7xDP1l/LD4WOG/eKb0uqLidvUlZdZE=; b=KxGHVceeUGmykiKDjxfkeEi6C1xQGNXODedbYHxv2Ul/JfUToR83dRMqnZ/3+ZPBj5f7bN TE6QIiSpB582xcj0FCfqhlVnUjUXHpGxolvVtym+CcaLxA+0Z6A0mggNQTtz7nedwI89TW esnhFx9b19y6pmV4qHtYqT6CsgsSFrU= Received: from mail-lf1-f72.google.com (mail-lf1-f72.google.com [209.85.167.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-369-CASmOXDJPj2eKNYY7yMdfA-1; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 04:52:27 -0400 X-MC-Unique: CASmOXDJPj2eKNYY7yMdfA-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f72.google.com with SMTP id k18-20020a05651210d200b003fd86616d39so1319425lfg.2 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 01:52:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=d6IfoHV3doIzC7xDP1l/LD4WOG/eKb0uqLidvUlZdZE=; b=yOxPCng16xcmmgszCTmr7vKawVcBsIyulXv03uqJnC3OCCksTFqtdBlKggolTbTMDs QaJUOThwZhVLSwIMdf4y0GSVedS9LYyzSSPJj1JEDheCf9QJ4sxdaWMChzTRJg2IlbSB WLXEcr+HQMbMRKmBYsNP4Bni0eOjw8vgffdHmkQogvoD/WgIIMuvXv9h0M/rtBO0/+pa au8zJg+y2Bfbg/trYpqE7WR3KWTg8t5wtBpYnrJytWhra6wTdOvRnQzTvqd2jOk2Nvlh uCCgmaeP1qhgoXsDq2NSnKEk1rKtkHVrrKK5UoleLaFwCvP0keIix4s1n4cO8xidI/NP kQIA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532tEJWJGeo7s0vmQaO8dRlCrprIHOLp7ktRq+RKNXFZrlU5LCHQ fyVMh9DRit2E94TghKQTZPepqZUW9CmlA8X48yb0yCmSguKJsOfg5b7oAzhRBr1BkgLvVPBV/iK K3B9GuBhcXgMTydxbqWc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:202a:: with SMTP id s10mr9715847lfs.560.1634287945821; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 01:52:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy8UOiP+q7O5iND9OG6Ss7nD3PbjaJFthqAovo4PqMKcQJFtED+Erer/LH22wiTjTB4WZnN5WgddBzvMTPJiHc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:202a:: with SMTP id s10mr9715824lfs.560.1634287945606; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 01:52:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210910135205.269651-1-wenwux.ma@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:52:14 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Xia, Chenbo" Cc: "Ma, WenwuX" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "maxime.coquelin@redhat.com" , "Jiang, Cheng1" , "Hu, Jiayu" , "Wang, Yinan" Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/vhost: change the default value of NIC's max queues X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 5:17 AM Xia, Chenbo wrote: > > if NIC=E2=80=99s max queues > the default number of 128, > > so, we changed the default value from 128 to 512. > > > > I'd say it's not cool to still hard-code the MAX_QUEUES so that only 'som= e' NICs > can work with the example. The app should have a way to check this kind o= f info +1... > before init/start. But as I would like to see at some point, this example= will > be removed and all our tests go to testpmd. Let's not waste too much effo= rt on > this example. And +1, this example is a mess. --=20 David Marchand