From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>,
nd <nd@arm.com>, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>,
Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] test/cycles: restore original delay function
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 14:21:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8wSM9ni7HmnhDas36XM1kAGCap+rXKbg5vRsdo5LZ5xPg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200727102151.192516-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:22 PM Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> wrote:
>
> test_delay_us_sleep registers sleep based delay for testing.
> This changes the default delay function of testing environment.
> It is not expected.
>
> Restore default delay function after the test to fix the issue.
>
> Fixes: a51639cc720a ("eal: add nanosleep based delay function")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
> ---
> v2:
> Dropped other patches in the series that are not needed.
>
> app/test/test_cycles.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_cycles.c b/app/test/test_cycles.c
> index c78e6a5b1..015a9290f 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_cycles.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_cycles.c
> @@ -79,8 +79,14 @@ REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(cycles_autotest, test_cycles);
> static int
> test_delay_us_sleep(void)
> {
> + int rv = 0;
No initialisation needed, I removed it while applying.
> +
> rte_delay_us_callback_register(rte_delay_us_sleep);
> - return check_wait_one_second();
> + rv = check_wait_one_second();
> + /* restore original delay function */
> + rte_delay_us_callback_register(rte_delay_us_block);
> +
> + return rv;
> }
>
> REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(delay_us_sleep_autotest, test_delay_us_sleep);
Reviewed-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Applied, thanks.
--
David Marchand
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-27 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-24 7:43 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] arm64 CI stabilize Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-24 7:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] test/cycles: restore original delay function Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-24 7:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] test/cycles: increase threshold for containers on aarch64 Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-24 7:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] ci: expose test time out argument Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-24 7:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] ci: increase time out multiplier for containers on aarch64 Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-27 10:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] test/cycles: restore original delay function Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-27 10:21 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-27 12:21 ` David Marchand [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJFAV8wSM9ni7HmnhDas36XM1kAGCap+rXKbg5vRsdo5LZ5xPg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).