From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DEE246A39; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:45:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965A5402E1; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:45:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD42C40151 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:45:15 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1750697115; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OCI297KccGdaCE7wHahZmEew6g3cMXPnEQ/bII0ZyqM=; b=ABwsZNxzw2119SbCY12xXnbcf0izQRSbPwxeYkJYb+tU1ZTGP6+JmH3iYm8p0swkLzHp/x h6ixETI+RF4C84/J8Y0V/u5TrNsk/XpD9co0JJ9WAozI0L/QeILSevd0jd39Uo1nbfidB4 CeE8ULbjRiwgC02PyKetihIt4Izw+Zw= Received: from mail-lf1-f69.google.com (mail-lf1-f69.google.com [209.85.167.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-686-dkjqYmEeNb2IaRDJotzVyA-1; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 12:45:09 -0400 X-MC-Unique: dkjqYmEeNb2IaRDJotzVyA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: dkjqYmEeNb2IaRDJotzVyA_1750697108 Received: by mail-lf1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-551ec3101c7so1745162e87.2 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 09:45:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1750697107; x=1751301907; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=OCI297KccGdaCE7wHahZmEew6g3cMXPnEQ/bII0ZyqM=; b=MN7huTdOIAdLjsF9GcN+Os49IeKPo2xaco7foxeaKL+thWUk5k3PIGy5wQQxGYF/E8 ghJeq7wQPx8Cxqs0zOAslTNJJAsJU+gysAqBH3mn7TmQubAIApBp8J4b3NpyM067+GT5 3uAbvq+eghMtSbRKf63wOsrjD0YcbVfXU1WCcaU1b/fEPKAab+xHrY0Kv61h7BdB1kWN B1lCrzkve/KYzPvA5s+XckO0xjrv8V+gLS60vuIkM+1Uq85nAvYLSAjzkiovOzqlDDgf LUS2cWodHSy1vqUOhoZAYFRYEor0wt5a2l0V0bEiQF2WrSP+VBmQqU647xCYwLHHuQkz hedg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyauIhKvMHu3m5sCRMHUt8vyb66ertSPvDGNf4M0OUejOVNCWcv yZGojeMVWF/aD5N72QVzyGTVuJN48BY2dyfgD+ZRsGzS1JpYd0HIub86AO6J17lyrN9W4C8XzFb omhILtD7ptv6lOEn0T1meVwtwtzWLnIGB6KqLCVfp7KVj4V26sUfElukN5na0lIPcSiQ24RFnQh UZquol8xDrV1WMWIvvNgo= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctJjoTlRIB5xsQp2nL7sd878MdWgjUPR61mNGZIHG1bsFUBIQpPoTxVKjsqPrF 1tNm891Rec2WNWyIuK45pVjSt4LD/u66f0g6ytPd5919/GnxCEG6JzPXl/3poJ0Q+GltTut0Ub4 TWc1GCCQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:239d:b0:553:268e:5018 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-553e3be91c3mr4196673e87.31.1750697107554; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 09:45:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFavR0xd6Jbf0AYremXH8k/AhEbnQt8K/Zx7boSn8OimHrlgsurrXxyfzoS88UukwzNleExrMO+P11jwl2qtcE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:239d:b0:553:268e:5018 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-553e3be91c3mr4196661e87.31.1750697107108; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 09:45:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20250313113829.1480907-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20250527152913.279011-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20250527152913.279011-2-bruce.richardson@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:44:55 +0200 X-Gm-Features: AX0GCFvZ7QN_1zJQORdffjLZPWere1vwJ6Sdwb32Wz_gDpm4hHRijUpSA_wDmdM Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] eal: deprecate old coremask-based EAL parameters To: Bruce Richardson Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: -5_U0Gk96PwHKdNuQNiCvh9JxRYCiMpuDjHSkmR2iYk_1750697108 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 6:13=E2=80=AFPM Bruce Richardson wrote: > > This patch will need some rebase. > > > > I see you fixed a few docs, but there are quite some misses in > > copy/pasted blocks: > > > I'll take a look and respin this. > > I'm think of separating it into two patches: first patch with the doc > updates to remove use of -c flag. This should happen independent of the > deprecation, I think, and second patch just the deprecation notice. Does > that sound reasonable? Yes, we can already cleanup the docs (advertising lists instead of mask), and then have the deprecation notice. --=20 David Marchand