From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CB5A04BA; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 11:26:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F551B3C8; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 11:26:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044AD2B8C for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 11:26:32 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1602062791; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HnToyBXg+U4+GUj5Z+e5XRHv42UCGmuG2+ED202GJEA=; b=OIcg7HL60iGn6/OXT1HlF+oMQb9QH85OWlkGrYyz4eDGL+DPMwYEQRpUaNhkSnjVFmYRcW noVG/RQSJ6vrJVv5l24ctI9jjvb/HLIF2tqz7mSApUbD4bm4BRaDKKYSy8q7yofVcApaX/ wEaru0gcRSJ5UkYKEl6pfwjAsmYf42U= Received: from mail-io1-f70.google.com (mail-io1-f70.google.com [209.85.166.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-270-bnaXWX8DMfOgo0BfwvexSg-1; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 05:26:29 -0400 X-MC-Unique: bnaXWX8DMfOgo0BfwvexSg-1 Received: by mail-io1-f70.google.com with SMTP id e21so937661iod.5 for ; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 02:26:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HnToyBXg+U4+GUj5Z+e5XRHv42UCGmuG2+ED202GJEA=; b=U1RE0m/RRsklwqsIWjH6ODFk9I6moi9fcl02RkdICzC0XJJkcBh7WURsWTSE3NWT5y 5UMo1qElivUFjkzE22yhrAZJ4Cp0STdR1//fovKswyejnA4y+UPha4FIbPurFcTSs6SX MQNM+iJ7GroK6Q7FvoZMniwulLnmqRuZa1EwZ6kF0VSO7OQReKkhPYjV3C6+GkE+QrOG YehI+cWEh3bL9rZmZSEGocthrF1XUyHWm6/Kn+cSHtBEflGSSTNod3ncXTgVd+ISvkfu BsoEAScTsGxAaVxFG3rVHYwiMcSpsYgtEsZbIxOS3MJAadZOItEt/+EinSl8Ga6td455 n5EQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531FqVPCA770cUICHDpRKFx4+tbSRk/xSxx++OqJUncQaeF7RgNS Q8/qGk9sIN5Oh24wpZgxEQYA/cKM4jZOHSwmA0xYCHDn0AcW285VPtP8uNmyGWex2LLOjH7RrFr joWidgi7thjGgf4zEqLM= X-Received: by 2002:a02:caa1:: with SMTP id e1mr2140343jap.80.1602062788763; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 02:26:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyaGEBhkLWrfJFC+Cy0dUK4gXTZyZJFwkBT5tj8OFSVnBWTmw33Vet/Dsh9a/XyYdt5ijzvcfJLJE4rZ+wwgpA= X-Received: by 2002:a02:caa1:: with SMTP id e1mr2140337jap.80.1602062788575; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 02:26:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1601393761-11588-1-git-send-email-mairtin.oloingsigh@intel.com> <20201006162319.7981-1-mairtin.oloingsigh@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20201006162319.7981-1-mairtin.oloingsigh@intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 11:26:17 +0200 Message-ID: To: Olivier Matz , Bruce Richardson , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , "Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" Cc: "Singh, Jasvinder" , Pablo de Lara , dev , "Ryan, Brendan" , David Coyle , Mairtin o Loingsigh Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] net: add CRC run-time checks and AVX512/VPCLMULQDQ based CRC X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 6:23 PM Mairtin o Loingsigh wrote: > > This patchset makes two significant enhancements to the CRC modules of > the rte_net library: > > 1) Adds run-time selection of the optimal architecture-specific CRC path. > Previously the selection was solely made at compile-time, meaning it > could only be built and run on the same generation of CPU. Adding > run-time selection ability means this can be used from distro packages > and/or DPDK can be compiled on an older CPU and run on a newer CPU. > 2) Adds an optimized CRC implementation based on the AVX512 and > VPCLMULQDQ instruction sets. > > For further details, please see the commit messages of the individual > patches. Reviews please? Thanks. -- David Marchand