DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Jasvinder Singh <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] net: simplify build-time logic for x86
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 11:24:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8wi2HU3Z5-1HzoN0UsMCaoPMh9BdUPm1oAbhQgi__HmNw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250318173505.314529-10-bruce.richardson@intel.com>

On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 6:36 PM Bruce Richardson
<bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
>
> All DPDK-supported versions of clang and gcc have the "-mpclmul" and
> "-maes" flags, so we never need to check for those. This allows the SSE
> code path to be unconditionally built on x86.
>
> For the AVX512 code path, simplify it by only checking for the
> build-time support, and always doing a separate build with AVX512
> support when that compiler support is present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/net/meson.build   | 53 +++++--------------------------------------
>  lib/net/rte_net_crc.c |  8 +++----
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/net/meson.build b/lib/net/meson.build
> index c9b34afc98..4bbbad3f42 100644
> --- a/lib/net/meson.build
> +++ b/lib/net/meson.build
> @@ -42,57 +42,16 @@ deps += ['mbuf']
>  use_function_versioning = true
>
>  if dpdk_conf.has('RTE_ARCH_X86_64')
> -    net_crc_sse42_cpu_support = (cc.get_define('__PCLMUL__', args: machine_args) != '')
> -    net_crc_avx512_cpu_support = (
> -            target_has_avx512 and
> -            cc.get_define('__VPCLMULQDQ__', args: machine_args) != ''
> -    )
> -
> -    net_crc_sse42_cc_support = (cc.has_argument('-mpclmul') and cc.has_argument('-maes'))
> -    net_crc_avx512_cc_support = (cc.has_argument('-mvpclmulqdq') and cc_has_avx512)
> -
> -    build_static_net_crc_sse42_lib = 0
> -    build_static_net_crc_avx512_lib = 0
> -
> -    if net_crc_sse42_cpu_support == true
> -        sources += files('net_crc_sse.c')
> -        cflags += ['-DCC_X86_64_SSE42_PCLMULQDQ_SUPPORT']
> -        if net_crc_avx512_cpu_support == true
> -            sources += files('net_crc_avx512.c')
> -            cflags += ['-DCC_X86_64_AVX512_VPCLMULQDQ_SUPPORT']
> -        elif net_crc_avx512_cc_support == true
> -            build_static_net_crc_avx512_lib = 1
> -            net_crc_avx512_lib_cflags = cc_avx512_flags + ['-mvpclmulqdq']
> -            cflags += ['-DCC_X86_64_AVX512_VPCLMULQDQ_SUPPORT']
> -        endif
> -    elif net_crc_sse42_cc_support == true
> -        build_static_net_crc_sse42_lib = 1
> -        net_crc_sse42_lib_cflags = ['-mpclmul', '-maes']
> -        cflags += ['-DCC_X86_64_SSE42_PCLMULQDQ_SUPPORT']
> -        if net_crc_avx512_cc_support == true
> -            build_static_net_crc_avx512_lib = 1
> -            net_crc_avx512_lib_cflags = cc_avx512_flags + ['-mvpclmulqdq', '-mpclmul']
> -            cflags += ['-DCC_X86_64_AVX512_VPCLMULQDQ_SUPPORT']
> -        endif
> -    endif
> -
> -    if build_static_net_crc_sse42_lib == 1
> -        net_crc_sse42_lib = static_library(
> -                'net_crc_sse42_lib',
> -                'net_crc_sse.c',
> -                dependencies: static_rte_eal,
> -                c_args: [cflags,
> -                    net_crc_sse42_lib_cflags])
> -        objs += net_crc_sse42_lib.extract_objects('net_crc_sse.c')
> -    endif
> -
> -    if build_static_net_crc_avx512_lib == 1
> +    sources += files('net_crc_sse.c')
> +    cflags += ['-mpclmul', '-maes']
> +    if cc.has_argument('-mvpclmulqdq') and cc_has_avx512
> +        net_crc_avx512_lib_cflags = cc_avx512_flags + ['-mvpclmulqdq']

Nit: we don't need this intermediate variable. But well, it gets
removed in next patch.

> +        cflags += ['-DCC_X86_64_AVX512_VPCLMULQDQ_SUPPORT']
>          net_crc_avx512_lib = static_library(
>                  'net_crc_avx512_lib',
>                  'net_crc_avx512.c',
>                  dependencies: static_rte_eal,
> -                c_args: [cflags,
> -                    net_crc_avx512_lib_cflags])
> +                c_args: [cflags, net_crc_avx512_lib_cflags])
>          objs += net_crc_avx512_lib.extract_objects('net_crc_avx512.c')
>      endif
>
> diff --git a/lib/net/rte_net_crc.c b/lib/net/rte_net_crc.c
> index 2fb3eec231..c9773d6300 100644
> --- a/lib/net/rte_net_crc.c
> +++ b/lib/net/rte_net_crc.c
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static const rte_net_crc_handler handlers_avx512[] = {
>         [RTE_NET_CRC32_ETH] = rte_crc32_eth_avx512_handler,
>  };
>  #endif
> -#ifdef CC_X86_64_SSE42_PCLMULQDQ_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef RTE_ARCH_X86_64
>  static const rte_net_crc_handler handlers_sse42[] = {
>         [RTE_NET_CRC16_CCITT] = rte_crc16_ccitt_sse42_handler,
>         [RTE_NET_CRC32_ETH] = rte_crc32_eth_sse42_handler,
> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ avx512_vpclmulqdq_init(void)
>  static const rte_net_crc_handler *
>  sse42_pclmulqdq_get_handlers(void)
>  {
> -#ifdef CC_X86_64_SSE42_PCLMULQDQ_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef RTE_ARCH_X86_64
>         if (SSE42_PCLMULQDQ_CPU_SUPPORTED &&
>                         max_simd_bitwidth >= RTE_VECT_SIMD_128)
>                 return handlers_sse42;
> @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ sse42_pclmulqdq_get_handlers(void)
>  static void
>  sse42_pclmulqdq_init(void)
>  {
> -#ifdef CC_X86_64_SSE42_PCLMULQDQ_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef RTE_ARCH_x86_64
>         if (SSE42_PCLMULQDQ_CPU_SUPPORTED)
>                 rte_net_crc_sse42_init();
>  #endif
> @@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ handlers_init(enum rte_net_crc_alg alg)
>  #endif
>                 /* fall-through */
>         case RTE_NET_CRC_SSE42:
> -#ifdef CC_X86_64_SSE42_PCLMULQDQ_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef RTE_ARCH_X86_64
>                 if (SSE42_PCLMULQDQ_CPU_SUPPORTED) {
>                         handlers_dpdk26[alg].f[RTE_NET_CRC16_CCITT] =
>                                 rte_crc16_ccitt_sse42_handler;
> --
> 2.43.0
>

-- 
David Marchand


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-19 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-14 17:23 [PATCH 0/3] remove driver-specific logic for AVX builds Bruce Richardson
2025-03-14 17:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] build: add generalized AVX handling for drivers Bruce Richardson
2025-03-14 17:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] net/intel: use common AVX build code Bruce Richardson
2025-03-14 17:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] drivers/net: build use common AVX handling Bruce Richardson
2025-03-14 17:31   ` David Marchand
2025-03-14 17:37     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-03-14 17:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] remove driver-specific logic for AVX builds Bruce Richardson
2025-03-14 17:44   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] build: add generalized AVX handling for drivers Bruce Richardson
2025-03-14 17:44   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] net/intel: use common AVX build code Bruce Richardson
2025-03-14 17:44   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] drivers/net: build use common AVX handling Bruce Richardson
2025-03-14 17:44   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] drivers/net: remove AVX2 build-time define Bruce Richardson
2025-03-17  9:47     ` David Marchand
2025-03-17  9:50   ` [PATCH v2 0/4] remove driver-specific logic for AVX builds David Marchand
2025-03-18 11:51     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-03-18 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] remove component-specific " Bruce Richardson
2025-03-18 17:34   ` [PATCH v3 01/11] build: add generalized AVX handling for drivers Bruce Richardson
2025-03-18 17:34   ` [PATCH v3 02/11] net/intel: use common AVX build code Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 10:11     ` David Marchand
2025-03-19 11:17       ` Bruce Richardson
2025-03-18 17:34   ` [PATCH v3 03/11] drivers/net: build use common AVX handling Bruce Richardson
2025-03-18 17:34   ` [PATCH v3 04/11] drivers/net: remove AVX2 build-time define Bruce Richardson
2025-03-18 17:42     ` Ajit Khaparde
2025-03-18 17:34   ` [PATCH v3 05/11] event/dlb2: build using common AVX handling Bruce Richardson
2025-03-18 17:34   ` [PATCH v3 06/11] build: add generalized AVX handling for libs Bruce Richardson
2025-03-18 17:35   ` [PATCH v3 07/11] acl: use common AVX build handling Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 10:16     ` David Marchand
2025-03-19 10:26       ` Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 10:40         ` David Marchand
2025-03-19 10:59           ` Bruce Richardson
2025-03-18 17:35   ` [PATCH v3 08/11] fib: " Bruce Richardson
2025-03-18 17:35   ` [PATCH v3 09/11] net: simplify build-time logic for x86 Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 10:24     ` David Marchand [this message]
2025-03-18 17:35   ` [PATCH v3 10/11] net: use common AVX512 build code Bruce Richardson
2025-03-18 17:35   ` [PATCH v3 11/11] member: use common AVX512 build support Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 10:27   ` [PATCH v3 00/11] remove component-specific logic for AVX builds David Marchand
2025-03-19 17:29 ` [PATCH v4 " Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 17:29   ` [PATCH v4 01/11] drivers: add generalized AVX build handling Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 17:29   ` [PATCH v4 02/11] net/intel: use common AVX build code Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 17:29   ` [PATCH v4 03/11] drivers/net: build use common AVX handling Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 17:29   ` [PATCH v4 04/11] drivers/net: remove AVX2 build-time define Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 17:29   ` [PATCH v4 05/11] event/dlb2: build using common AVX handling Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 17:29   ` [PATCH v4 06/11] lib: add generalized AVX build handling Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 17:29   ` [PATCH v4 07/11] acl: use common " Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 17:29   ` [PATCH v4 08/11] fib: " Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 17:29   ` [PATCH v4 09/11] net: simplify build-time logic for x86 Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 17:29   ` [PATCH v4 10/11] net: use common AVX512 build code Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 17:29   ` [PATCH v4 11/11] member: use common AVX512 build support Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 18:08   ` [PATCH v4 00/11] remove component-specific logic for AVX builds Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJFAV8wi2HU3Z5-1HzoN0UsMCaoPMh9BdUPm1oAbhQgi__HmNw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jasvinder.singh@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).