From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF20A034E; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 16:51:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7D51BF92; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 16:51:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EDF11BF91 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 16:51:34 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1573141894; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8g9teBNPu0P3oUlXlNXkB1FLPzVf3F6ZMQ3VavlCmFA=; b=THOe7EmrYp+6ov/1JdZ/eoB+h58SMJVF2wypMzeYMK5/Lu9+jc9rjuuyJn3TESghVYrMSA EzfkPRKd3iJkmJ5KNT3dyoMTdKEGosKkPl+BgUg6rRV79PDo6vAZHI32Rqy6xoKoEVdpdL FhA2GGpQ/aaNO6qkt7MEa0As1ocLBNs= Received: from mail-vk1-f197.google.com (mail-vk1-f197.google.com [209.85.221.197]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-305-icO37TOyNdiHQ3DOTPZ-Rg-1; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 10:51:32 -0500 Received: by mail-vk1-f197.google.com with SMTP id i5so1264276vkg.21 for ; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 07:51:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Htdw9w3tQIxl+maPOinJ+hZ74TWHT/NQscymBsCBjZk=; b=ePCMHcpKnofvrcBFMjmSHObFha2HE1D1KXauhuXgZM7OsO9ZqE2moWbhk6tp6UI/9x PkjG9phJApXBCg8vOr7UP57tU9zlC8WeKSnYdlqE6pKXedCBDx5i+Iq6M0Jq8+rCssxE SRWfCyYSrOVjiu4IoqDjoTcD4jaECw04TLzMbzFKyvkAAFBhalVN0mamm9L766WvB/sB J74rzwil5W69iFVwhSqrL/WvaUcSun5LSioVYoH2BD42jxT9Z4vIHiC/Q+OtsshB5mYg RJ1TNe+5QslDDixfLLK2ehbEkRtO2vgTvi1DwuFCyY+bNoo2DEKbhYyzeJR39GZQN+E/ uDLA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXtnV/PVLe8FaNsN7H9mqM98SH4tatkYYaH3PG9fZvlLYt4Awe5 a3osfRlaxoq+vBw0FGJOiSxv2V2dUYuT4RbG4P+i3J2fPNX5NnhwjmYCikqqZtypdtMNWrwcam9 Nn/TMhNIb/T+hhyR78as= X-Received: by 2002:a67:7d95:: with SMTP id y143mr3522937vsc.39.1573141891401; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 07:51:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyDI1ub+jeJQqL41gfMCJ1B+IJ8xwzcPdgE2Xrep8R4ApI/o+sSNTTXYErlTpk/efgdBTUyYOQCBryJJ+hY8VM= X-Received: by 2002:a67:7d95:: with SMTP id y143mr3522913vsc.39.1573141890963; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 07:51:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191015053047.52260-1-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> <83009bb3-1e0c-a22e-eff8-41a437817cb7@intel.com> <64edebee-3686-beca-2b30-c6ec1f26c162@intel.com> <31bff5b7-169c-e158-3a87-6448272c571c@intel.com> <32f3cd1a-08bb-e4bc-c22c-53453b936dd3@intel.com> <3a954a3f-1fc5-47f0-64f2-a7c8e3fbf964@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 16:51:19 +0100 Message-ID: To: Rajesh Ravi Cc: Ajit Khaparde , dev , Jonathan Richardson , Scott Branden , Vikram Mysore Prakash , Srinath Mannam , "Burakov, Anatoly" X-MC-Unique: icO37TOyNdiHQ3DOTPZ-Rg-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: add option --iso-cmem for external custom memory X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 2:55 PM David Marchand w= rote: > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 6:14 PM Burakov, Anatoly > wrote: > > > > On 05-Nov-19 3:18 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: > > > On 05-Nov-19 2:10 PM, Rajesh Ravi wrote: > > >> Thanks a lot Anatoly. > > >> Will the same solution work with DPDK 19.02 as well? We 're actuall= y > > >> using DPDK 19.02 for memory allocations for SPDK 19.07. > > >> DPDK 19.11 may not be supported by SPDK 19.07 we 're currently using= . > > >> > > >> I 'll definitely test if the patch works with DPDK 19.02 > > >> > > >> Thanks again for your time and help. > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Rajesh > > > > > > Hi Rajesh, > > > > > > Please test the patch [1] and see if it works for you. The patch is n= ot > > > intended for 19.02 (in fact, 19.02 is not even supported any more), b= ut > > > it may still apply. In the meantime, i'm working on a different patch > > > for 18.11, that will achieve the same thing using different means. > > > > > > [1] http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/62468/ > > > > > > > The following is an alternative implementation that is based off 18.11: > > > > http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/62486/ > Thanks Rajesh, following your test report, I applied Anatoly patch. A backport will go to 18.11. I will mark this current proposal as rejected. If you think it should still be considered, then please set this patch state back to new in patchwork and explain what is missing in this thread. Thanks. --=20 David Marchand