From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E08BA04FF; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 13:59:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE1A1C1BB; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 13:59:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB1E1C1AE for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 13:59:09 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1579006748; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QE5LqmJI4H2UoDxUZK5ta8R8Q5Ke7t4Hfwus8wJrG8c=; b=YKlbEkNeHaUuy4Epz3fF48fhxgj4IE0WtQVDkuIpavIjEpDYfa0gg+E1+iIsV5Z54zY+K/ yeX+ujFzRv4menPX+14zz0pZLReIR9wV36byE2mhhbOumjIaPevfvYQ96oNhRnKHCUynoG BIb3zODA/L4ChyFDOrzR0HbeQYBLWFI= Received: from mail-ua1-f72.google.com (mail-ua1-f72.google.com [209.85.222.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-79--GSxcrJwNa-gUvK2_r9N6Q-1; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 07:59:02 -0500 Received: by mail-ua1-f72.google.com with SMTP id t26so2101713ual.17 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 04:59:01 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NAYDc55zavtAp3GRoTO2UTbdgEg+uaFEkaFyFdlyHxs=; b=mKgfDrM12NDJjaqrv+Szo7ksNpkBRy6CHqxu1OYV3m5J6wViu/RhmPebNbJCZlz9yS fUxC1I1drVvYXh2Gq3Dr+28RPdz/cQ25ou27ni3DLQSwihs4816CtA0zaqGoXQIYId0D 2pkR2jY7JB5ShBbQtkNzxRTQilaBvF3yVY3mOA5J09aMetcweVc0mZmUIeWf6o1C0el+ OB5yni+ijP/Rw1q7fpJH7QaCvMVWVZFMPi2QGH5sd8pIBqUy2qFF98+0AfyPbbCO++bO tdnPok+5FOGHqpuRvj4TG+YGZfF/ikdlcfm3bks9SnrPR+Kb9P+w45uy24d3ZGcVTi6I e7FA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWqdkZMei5TAFGZl0mDTxzvvYceqVfshyDyGNxr9g+nqq/y8/h6 xW5QH8qISi4/I28jkBAArNH2fQzMuCXmQjLz/crFc/AidCfWh3zDDDsLo85iqIwbZGYtoly4SAT 53SCY+kXk4K7ahS+XbUc= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:2408:: with SMTP id f8mr10391046uan.126.1579006741440; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 04:59:01 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwG8BaUDJRFIaKiLcr4YK9xVT7jYoGY33kw4R0JQnZ22yCdMHuvJR8C5OuE/9tsAaOT7mudg4glPUIVMKmnPho= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:2408:: with SMTP id f8mr10391038uan.126.1579006741191; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 04:59:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191202153559.9709-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20191202153559.9709-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 13:58:50 +0100 Message-ID: To: dev Cc: Aaron Conole X-MC-Unique: -GSxcrJwNa-gUvK2_r9N6Q-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Extend --lcores to run on cores > RTE_MAX_LCORE X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 4:36 PM David Marchand w= rote: > > We are currently stuck with no option but recompile a DPDK if the system > has more cores than RTE_MAX_LCORE. > A bit of a pity when you get a system with more than 200+ cores and your > testpmd has been built and packaged with RTE_MAX_LCORE =3D=3D 128. > > The --lcores does not need to care about the underlying cores, remove > this limitation. Any comment? Thanks. --=20 David Marchand