From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07DEA0A0C; Thu, 13 May 2021 10:39:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270824067E; Thu, 13 May 2021 10:39:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3284003F for ; Thu, 13 May 2021 10:39:16 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1620895156; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=w3D4AmxfsUCxbE9T/Ygk8u/pXgblmB3b4jl2MlX9AHw=; b=MYVqsmc8ul3kNVmt8u6lp3mj389bSPuN24HcJ/vko+IWp7UKEF3NzFWS6s3/7Yb/mfyd9l 0z5mXTe20zIKZ9YFhSvKpLsH/dKUNgfRcPeWng6R4At8QDC4wBkvmWbGQFnE1HJxpyi3q/ 3V+40Oxiop+JbGomghP0FLxICXQtpXI= Received: from mail-vk1-f200.google.com (mail-vk1-f200.google.com [209.85.221.200]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-208-7e0o8g7oOfWsTkgIn1cwMg-1; Thu, 13 May 2021 04:39:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 7e0o8g7oOfWsTkgIn1cwMg-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f200.google.com with SMTP id t190-20020a1f46c70000b02901eba03cbf81so3381324vka.16 for ; Thu, 13 May 2021 01:39:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=w3D4AmxfsUCxbE9T/Ygk8u/pXgblmB3b4jl2MlX9AHw=; b=hdhXvkomrLq+/gj8uQvf94+EBwRhv3jFWJ7wcG4dlvrGrOqHPnjoldUEZ9Z4k5309g /bvWxHBJwTy08MCDfhpKI5MCW051dYCRQ8rQLR0tpLNwDFtpbgTJJKuuYsAU8mTNE7mX yIb9SXTbVTcDg10yRLcHRf3IiofzFjHU3dAjv3e8C3yDZg+bTOZO/bm3rYnf+F2fp8xw vGeyqFukky+T9qOsjsj0Ab3quUv+fEV/dfN6YH2CT7OUY+IOg1fSfwhEboWU7Kvp3qyK bWde7ZIwsSLykOvmH89QHMYQxU3GoThlRwyZmp9HYT8VbpX7GSF1AlvMMmUVBG6hESi/ a/ow== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5322FJIiU+u0KuZXiT4tJtD8YVfUp76cPpth2WpJslPL3ZIAaN+y 5UjHZAr7gCoZGTZ9O8ARBPUvij7RWHibhV4wNGaOUsxT2+v1HZlhNbfWT/Q+5Bxyu+hWVSkR0Co WQO6pNj35+/NxzyxxYvg= X-Received: by 2002:a9f:368f:: with SMTP id p15mr36987576uap.41.1620895152253; Thu, 13 May 2021 01:39:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyVM/Kx2Yp1kwCxPiYV+t41GzGJaGmVoJ6MchR2334e53hFQgfVi/66f/kq6MhpcF2Tcs0XE8iCvrSQ0jjnCr4= X-Received: by 2002:a9f:368f:: with SMTP id p15mr36987568uap.41.1620895152048; Thu, 13 May 2021 01:39:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210202081446.79331-1-wanjunjie@bytedance.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 10:39:00 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Xia, Chenbo" , Maxime Coquelin Cc: Wan Junjie , "dev@dpdk.org" , Peng He , Zhihong Wang Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] vhost: avoid iotlb mempool allocation while IOMMU disabled X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 9:10 AM Xia, Chenbo wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wan Junjie > > Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 4:15 PM > > To: Xia, Chenbo ; Maxime Coquelin > > > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wan Junjie ; Peng He > > ; Zhihong Wang > > Subject: [PATCH v2] vhost: avoid iotlb mempool allocation while IOMMU disabled > > > > If vhost device's IOMMU feature is disabled, iotlb mempool allocation > > is unnecessary. > > > > Reported-by: Peng He > > Signed-off-by: Wan Junjie > > Reviewed-by: Zhihong Wang > > --- > > 2.11.0 > > Patch applied to next-virtio/main with conflict resolved, Thanks This patch triggered a regression reported by Red Hat QE. https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703 Reverting the patch is enough to fix the regression. I'll let you guys decide on the next step for 21.05. -- David Marchand