From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
"Tyler Retzlaff" <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal: fix return type of bsf safe functions
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 21:41:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8x3bxq00D7eMej29sjMw_whQOoGjfTCXoaTjEYHs9pFOg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221005154036.4187143-1-thomas@monjalon.net>
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 5:41 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> In a recent commit, changing return type from int to uint32_t,
> I did a last minute change to functions rte_bsf32_safe and rte_bsf64_safe,
> because thought they were forgotten.
> Actually these functions are returning 0 or 1, so it should be int.
> The return type is reverted to the original type for these 2 functions.
>
> Fixes: 4b81c145ae37 ("eal: change return type of bsf/fls functions")
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Reviewed-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-05 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-10 23:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: propose correction rte_bsf64 return type declaration Tyler Retzlaff
2021-03-15 19:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: propose correction rte_{bsf, fls} inline functions type use Tyler Retzlaff
2021-10-25 19:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-26 7:45 ` Morten Brørup
2021-11-11 4:15 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-11-11 11:54 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-11 12:41 ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-11 14:07 ` Jerin Jacob
2022-07-13 10:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-07-18 21:28 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-08-08 21:21 ` [PATCH 0/3] cleanup bsf and fls inline function return types Tyler Retzlaff
2022-08-08 21:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] doc: announce cleanup of rte_{bsf, fls} inline functions type use Tyler Retzlaff
2022-10-05 9:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-08-08 21:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] eal: change rte_fls and rte_bsf to return uint32_t Tyler Retzlaff
2022-10-05 9:02 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-05 15:15 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-10-05 15:23 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-05 15:40 ` [PATCH] eal: fix return type of bsf safe functions Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-05 19:41 ` David Marchand [this message]
2022-10-05 22:20 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-10-06 0:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-06 18:20 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-08-08 21:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] test: fix sign compare warning for rte_bsf64 return type change Tyler Retzlaff
2022-08-08 21:42 ` [PATCH 0/3] cleanup bsf and fls inline function return types Stephen Hemminger
2022-08-09 8:26 ` Morten Brørup
2022-10-05 10:11 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJFAV8x3bxq00D7eMej29sjMw_whQOoGjfTCXoaTjEYHs9pFOg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).