From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE34A0561; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:41:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E1B1D8E0; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:41:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86CA1D8DF for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:41:46 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1587454905; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Ii3mvLe15AcN3mfvRWONnWliaHDUxdNTQYqKsTrgK7E=; b=DLADvBElqoTX5RJLQ92vfF8k8s7y2uUzIyTCVTApI93Fv/Y2EFiV+o7Qq4IlMxBxAiKRLE gxefkWZ56AhdEedos32DxO7bElJksltjU9Q3ycvy2RLmGCwx9TgoQeqf9NN6VINQplc4QN axGlEElxRPrGmLTnzgZU4ps9DvYuxuE= Received: from mail-il1-f199.google.com (mail-il1-f199.google.com [209.85.166.199]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-379-7JlB81h-NRmrqnK-Y0Od6A-1; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 03:41:44 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 7JlB81h-NRmrqnK-Y0Od6A-1 Received: by mail-il1-f199.google.com with SMTP id l18so15408755ilg.0 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 00:41:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ysS4rjq0FAoacuz5AOPWCwUH3CFayhSgl5HlgmdrL8s=; b=T0HlFuxJuSKLLOzemdG0OUy3+yl2hb4MgUH5nZT1IMI2sHDWPUI7nlDIw646TMnhOq T6MBJCNtw/MCPfOOyUZ9qZufv89ZnSmpdWStupW7bhAkQM7Ti4BTQdT2bGQevlXUKjI1 0CKmjl1iEGYrqpTL1E0YrRVCQ/5u3oe16OJVUPJ1EIhyDLZskt4phMyaCNDvgycPWsi4 ykOyk9xK40sl8TD1zBtHP8yIutwTalG+gI9j7/bNRzfAdPeEtkxWDt+2ynIk0R9clKW8 Ngz+1qpsB1BCnTcTwfiP1QwzkEvxpw0RozCUlQUGCuT2yPirJ35gM5IAEwdNIjEamX7p Wr4g== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZSEH7RibZ/+GS52UgI9qvTOtZAyXR3Xk34i00iaxEgi0iH6T8V g/LyYuAsjDXGPQjybNFu+hCN1yLFrmydBSWozhdzQzYm4q5WoifwZiwWPZau5jXVXWfhUOutZlh hxnfWLWT4d61bJFdqdNc= X-Received: by 2002:a92:bbd8:: with SMTP id x85mr20012402ilk.23.1587454903682; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 00:41:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJmhmhIGOYgqSlrhTkK8K6JWURdR0yF9YQCvvqVATZ8rOuryHg3mdvHn4Xi9p1rNM9nYgINDP5oUdcABzDiZqE= X-Received: by 2002:a92:bbd8:: with SMTP id x85mr20012384ilk.23.1587454903383; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 00:41:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200420070508.645533-1-fengli@smartx.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:41:32 +0200 Message-ID: To: Feng Li , Anatoly Burakov Cc: Li Feng , Kyle Zhang , dev X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: add madvise to avoid dump memory X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:41 AM Feng Li wrote: > > Thank you, Marchand, David is fine. > > I have just tested your patch, and it doesn't work. > The core dump file is still very very large, the same to virtual memory s= ize. Please double check that the patch is in. I remember checking coredump size with my patch. This needs more investigation but I don't have time atm. Anatoly, opinion? --=20 David Marchand