From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A19A0C4B; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 09:37:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9F24068E; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 09:37:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422CF40689 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 09:37:34 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1635669453; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QtQ7kd9u8hp2fccouSLr1WhFVzW51XJt8iiCRIR/Eag=; b=GlNlkjNo93IiGF9eHWJxLvgftCVavHF/dbcvvJxVIG3mMrSB6Gt+sCSw5AUMat5jn5vjlR P/d4V08AOjmzYVNCPd9cbxwQIYRBwtuLxLbYEjHQ/c7VX8fnmmW0+TdXClGythpky8UDec PjdxY4lxLhNtyHEM441J+pWq4zny9m0= Received: from mail-lj1-f200.google.com (mail-lj1-f200.google.com [209.85.208.200]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-239-bWUe5TejNQSb9MybOwXgZw-1; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 04:37:29 -0400 X-MC-Unique: bWUe5TejNQSb9MybOwXgZw-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f200.google.com with SMTP id q6-20020a2e2a06000000b00212c856abc8so1345492ljq.4 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 01:37:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QtQ7kd9u8hp2fccouSLr1WhFVzW51XJt8iiCRIR/Eag=; b=UWTm8IXnSkUpKZysoA0lJQXW52RCdVxbiPXrsRcFCF7zJFjEX6akmgpN4SBojRNECh 0wXTXqcmYdVCnMYQy9iJAoKH2I3yaicafiWuqxLnN3bPz6wLqqItLKIU+VYFtdGlp/hb V9mAQquMrGMeQV+5p94gkqfiuQR43+nnCr5pOxs1SE+Fx8YTWOpP7kFp2zDu+qpZ3tgY 0oaoECX3oB3SKRnujXMgrICQN16yBGiNt0c2kNVPn5h99RFOLLQT3eOvrYkE88nKzf6c OyR6RasbyNw09HD0dNDrGNqAz7NJBoVLaynQf8j6JNI1VPiThzVOTnXh81KnzSzKRXkm ZNCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5324Y32Czxy1d20eq1ioLiGnaawQjNr0bosd8EOj12HS71XzyIs9 +/ffV+uDOlU+NnunlsgCnxCM9iU70WvJCepB30yVVZCp8Qn0d2EgbnHd0DGAtCUcR8wYeeO8NWH TbiXM9sETHxt8kLI7Y+M= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1107:: with SMTP id d7mr22224094ljo.81.1635669448336; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 01:37:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwicckKlrktZ37qpu/hcKaQHt4oVfwmT6khg5wNOnHruwF65abbtgszYhKje+Vc8o5SL6U4s1/+FG9s5G+6Z8M= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1107:: with SMTP id d7mr22224077ljo.81.1635669448108; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 01:37:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210902053253.3017858-1-feifei.wang2@arm.com> <20211029082021.945586-1-feifei.wang2@arm.com> <20211029082021.945586-3-feifei.wang2@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20211029082021.945586-3-feifei.wang2@arm.com> From: David Marchand Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 09:37:16 +0100 Message-ID: To: Feifei Wang Cc: dev , nd , Jerin Jacob , Stephen Hemminger , Thomas Monjalon , =?UTF-8?Q?Mattias_R=C3=B6nnblom?= , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , Ruifeng Wang Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/5] eal: use wait event for read pflock X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:20 AM Feifei Wang wrote: > > Instead of polling for read pflock update, use wait event scheme for > this case. Please look at git history for this file. Prefix should be pflock: > > Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang -- David Marchand