From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: "Xia, Chenbo" <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
Yuanhan Liu <yliu@fridaylinux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost: avoid sleeping under mutex
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 13:22:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8xM5Bk5EOg01a1xmbZhjt9kQKg_UGx1pS0XUaNfQEr53Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR11MB3504DE8C692245F2DA1DFE699C749@SN6PR11MB3504.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 10:10 AM Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com> wrote:
> > Covscan reported:
> >
> > 2. dpdk-21.11/lib/vhost/socket.c:852: lock_acquire: Calling function
> > "pthread_mutex_lock" acquires lock "vhost_user.mutex".
> > 23. dpdk-21.11/lib/vhost/socket.c:955: sleep: Call to
> > "vhost_user_reconnect_init" might sleep while holding lock
> > "vhost_user.mutex".
> > # 953| vsocket->reconnect =
> > !(flags & RTE_VHOST_USER_NO_RECONNECT);
> > # 954| if (vsocket->reconnect && reconn_tid == 0) {
> > # 955|-> if (vhost_user_reconnect_init() != 0)
> > # 956| goto out_mutex;
> > # 957| }
> >
> > The reason for this warning is that vhost_user_reconnect_init() creates a
> > ctrl thread and calls nanosleep waiting for this thread to be ready,
> > while vhost_user.mutex is taken.
> >
> > Move the call to vhost_user_reconnect_init() out of this mutex.
> >
> > While at it, a pthread_t value should be considered opaque.
> > Instead of relying reconn_tid == 0, use an internal flag in
> > vhost_user_reconnect_init().
>
> Should we make reconn_tid not a global variable anymore then?
> Maybe a static pthread_t in vhost_user_reconnect_init?
Yep, I just sent a v2.
Thanks Chenbo.
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-15 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-22 17:05 David Marchand
2023-05-11 8:10 ` Xia, Chenbo
2023-05-15 11:22 ` David Marchand [this message]
2023-05-15 11:18 ` [PATCH v2] " David Marchand
2023-05-15 15:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJFAV8xM5Bk5EOg01a1xmbZhjt9kQKg_UGx1pS0XUaNfQEr53Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=yliu@fridaylinux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).