From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B709A0C54; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 14:01:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03C940E64; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 14:01:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2745740E3C for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 14:01:08 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1630670468; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=wkDOK/lh5xyTxlvXhkp+FPAnjqx373FCfEY7L9a6l7Y=; b=JI12wROY6UKAPpT9yL33tX8ko7pPNrGYzKd8yQ+CvppANTF1KzrNz49UNfdSO4NsEb1inJ H7ULJGBccD0A6DNsFYTymXdqjIn8qewSLXSUw7ZVN888VTK5O0pAtB8v4keQqBXxpDyMOe jWNM3Pqtfks4z3u9E1CfNLbFY6go9ZM= Received: from mail-lj1-f197.google.com (mail-lj1-f197.google.com [209.85.208.197]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-456-0-u8cO6sMouL5oUZEdln3g-1; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 08:01:07 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 0-u8cO6sMouL5oUZEdln3g-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f197.google.com with SMTP id s15-20020a2eb8cf000000b001cbf358ed4eso431371ljp.14 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 05:01:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wkDOK/lh5xyTxlvXhkp+FPAnjqx373FCfEY7L9a6l7Y=; b=FAMs9GVpzlHI1auT9YONTUOO/xOttW86Ir4FeaCpJ056V+kXJnI58V10diO55yy8KK uYPdIejmtNStv84mB6kHvO/OTG/N5QHp4MRLzMXESg5EOhmwfi87FpkPgE4EWm8L0Cok eBwzOqg8ut44akAKdiPvd+bOj2KkMmQCpgWM6UHpvzIwlo1Z0b7gk4c4wRoDZwCaTwfY 3y37oxd9CFiGi5Wv4K3iDhgaH3YyRlhXXkOuAEBZs6BKX+VCpaRUgooFhQKF4Gc9PezR KKUPB3eUehRYDhS7maysyACJJo39rEdNCnVF9eM69Rb1R+z6bH/zDK949zSVGT+Cl/Ax 03Zg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532s2t2fd44N2Jcpu07F2DDXpz/DLb8MCGfSrYaXEnCoRWDf7N2b s//siNiQWwCtjekv3u5X5xhA37crrJDLztuCyQ1RrfBqTXbn2vPhgE4HvsP1TW5Lx5NX5PZxvhZ CfAhKO+K7L1sk1L+YvpE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:36d9:: with SMTP id e25mr2543469lfs.553.1630670465769; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 05:01:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyCsLtmpqS2sXnToyLG6+fKH/h27HXSMcGNwlve/aNcHN0CF1WdYVdGFRkLpvTR8FpzWoaTIgLi3TyFemGS/ts= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:36d9:: with SMTP id e25mr2543454lfs.553.1630670465501; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 05:01:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210825205901.594F789060@noxus.dpdklab.iol.unh.edu> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 14:00:54 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Szwed, Maciej" , "Burakov, Anatoly" , Jeff Guo Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] |FAILURE| pw97277 [PATCH] [v4] eal: read data buffer on RTE_INTR_HANDLE_VFIO_REQ X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 10:59 AM Szwed, Maciej wrot= e: > -----Original Message----- > From: dev On Behalf Of Szwed, Maciej > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 11:34 AM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] |FAILURE| pw97277 [PATCH] [v4] eal: read data buf= fer on RTE_INTR_HANDLE_VFIO_REQ > > Hi, > I'm new to posting patches to DPDK repository. I've submitted a patch rec= ently and one of the tests performed on it failed. I went through the faile= d test log and it looks like it does not have anything to do with my patch.= You can check details below. What should be the next steps I should perfor= m? > About this specific failure in the CI, this is a known issue. This failure here won't block acceptance of this patch. But we need a review/ack for this patch. When submitting a patch, you should copy maintainers and people who worked on this part of DPDK. Anatoly, Jeff, can you have a look? Thanks. --=20 David Marchand