DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	Dodji Seketeli <dodji@redhat.com>
Cc: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	 Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2] ethdev: add dev configured flag
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 09:39:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8xVC=WcjFtj-h9kVWM4zU4fmXjeqRm-76oodh9cBiXt1A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <966ec9cd-9142-b40d-b059-b63c8ece66bf@oktetlabs.ru>

On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 10:36 AM Andrew Rybchenko
<andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru> wrote:
>
> @David, could you take a look at the ABI breakage warnings for
> the patch. May we ignore it since ABI looks backward
> compatible? Or should be marked as a minor change ABI
> which is backward compatible with DPDK_21?

The whole eth_dev_shared_data area has always been reset to 0 at the
first port allocation in a dpdk application life.
Subsequent calls to rte_eth_dev_release_port() reset every port
eth_dev->data to 0.

This bit flag is added in a hole of the structure, and it is
set/manipulated internally of ethdev.

So unless the application was doing something nasty like highjacking
this empty hole in the structure, I see no problem with the change wrt
ABI.


I wonder if libabigail is too strict on this report.
Or maybe there is some extreme consideration on what a compiler could
do about this hole...
Dodji?


For now, we can waive the warning.
I'll look into the exception rule to add.


-- 
David Marchand


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-07  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-08  8:00 [dpdk-dev] [RFC] lib/ethdev: " Huisong Li
2021-05-31  8:51 ` Huisong Li
2021-06-14 15:37 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-06-29  2:27   ` Huisong Li
2021-07-02 10:08     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-02 11:57       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-07-02 13:23         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-03  8:35           ` Huisong Li
2021-07-03 11:04             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-05  3:03               ` Huisong Li
2021-07-05  9:50                 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-05 11:22                   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-06  1:47                     ` Huisong Li
2021-07-04 20:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-05  3:18   ` Huisong Li
2021-07-05  6:07     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-05  9:50       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-06  1:48         ` Huisong Li
2021-07-06  3:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V1] ethdev: " Huisong Li
2021-07-06  4:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2] " Huisong Li
2021-07-06  8:36   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-07  2:55     ` Huisong Li
2021-07-07  8:25       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-07  9:26         ` Huisong Li
2021-07-07  7:39     ` David Marchand [this message]
2021-07-07  8:23       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-07  9:36         ` David Marchand
2021-07-07  9:59           ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-07 10:40             ` David Marchand
2021-07-07 10:57               ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-06 17:49   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-07  9:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V3] " Huisong Li
2021-07-08  9:56   ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJFAV8xVC=WcjFtj-h9kVWM4zU4fmXjeqRm-76oodh9cBiXt1A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dodji@redhat.com \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).