From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E13DA04DB; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:09:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77971DDE5; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:09:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A0C1DDE4 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:08:59 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1602756538; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=wUE1uIoEVRnVWHTAgjGD5e2yxs4ZXwmptE4DjxfovIQ=; b=fKhrcMwrcfjy5SFsI7+jDx0Y0Hkt6uQ1kQZ3yEMRH35D7G0vsTLl962EC40/tywuKIVQfH mcMNSQfnuq0h1qD2TYzQb7t4q+b1uPVJuuh5iV+tGZwNFGIyd5xJcxnnjd8cUmPc2uGxqv wA5FsatwqNc9QcEW2mPF3KXDrUIHeHU= Received: from mail-vs1-f72.google.com (mail-vs1-f72.google.com [209.85.217.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-387-e9WunlylNA-DTHtS0KO83A-1; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 06:08:55 -0400 X-MC-Unique: e9WunlylNA-DTHtS0KO83A-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f72.google.com with SMTP id r10so744425vsq.7 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 03:08:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wUE1uIoEVRnVWHTAgjGD5e2yxs4ZXwmptE4DjxfovIQ=; b=gLayf3E0B82a8rJGYTFIu4mQu3L8IN4/A1xPAkNSluTWwAhYzHYcyXteOfiT3irJmJ UksFCFdQyabI5+hIfXZmvpZhexXU57E3njj525YL4SrxsvEHWLvx2OnQdGVZRX6mFX5p LpdUA4Dqk9I6jxe3CrmsJ3jQSVZWpsb8KLdZHzP7w/LJxr7FfDbqmJcL5vYG80/qTRHa 8vyIC8+U0DhlvUNZnFj22JnT+bqAiBBOyIaNgP11D51iJ45o1XVmQFxq42iJ6DqVLGZB l+FRMQCU1vf+KPOYiuqTsF4kLYk6aiqoxEOX5JYi3agxhyDDIV4o52puaHHlBGKOjVPG RSqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530/PAVCNRtyLIvUQW85JgouR+aBDG6YJewVm9w23JZw0GXMU835 VjTx8CVKRWOkgWFNqj0Z8yiLtDYoNEz3JRj4gEGa9/ucpL8fBKmHnHl5kTu4CHnSixPJ4+i+lYz Nn3ZsbFi66Wd4txpKbYo= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:9651:: with SMTP id y78mr1971594vkd.22.1602756535116; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 03:08:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx55aMymt8Z4OLd/gxCLvlyBEi7YUnnTo5P1zveTEp+/zgVXm2VFz+tYZPs7wVigpmspBw4FoVNXWWZW33wuUY= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:9651:: with SMTP id y78mr1971584vkd.22.1602756534914; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 03:08:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201015095603.4141566-1-mdr@ashroe.eu> In-Reply-To: <20201015095603.4141566-1-mdr@ashroe.eu> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:08:43 +0200 Message-ID: To: Ray Kinsella Cc: Declan Doherty , Neil Horman , Anoob Joseph , Fiona Trahe , Akhil Goyal , Arek Kusztal , Thomas Monjalon , dev Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] cryptodev: revert support for 20.0 node X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 11:59 AM Ray Kinsella wrote: > > Function versioning to preserve the ABI was added to crytodev in > commit a0f0de06d457 ("cryptodev: fix ABI compatibility for > ChaCha20-Poly1305"). This is no longer required in the DPDK_21 > version node. Is it a duplicate for [1]? 1: https://git.dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-crypto/commit/lib/librte_cryptodev?id=e43f809f3a59a06f2bc80a2a6fe0c133f9e401fe -- David Marchand