From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58978A058A; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:23:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732161DC76; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:23:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E2CE1DC68 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:23:19 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1587129798; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=I6sHMM2xi37iWIByMUUD/TvkEgNjiodwnY2keN1jZ14=; b=ZHKewAyEw4yaOXfXj+1zkJYxpL9AnssGPfLhcUtpikUaVJWBhx2UbtEr35IzPzJ8huaQy+ Z7QsuX7njb91y53E+KlJ28w9KH2hTGJL90GAF6YeLdaKiFtKhzUoee1EA3M6ITbdNjqvmZ RrgGG9je69Y2LvR0KE9S0JomCDVcQRY= Received: from mail-vs1-f70.google.com (mail-vs1-f70.google.com [209.85.217.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-451-2rfS-sZcMiqrVXlJbqA75w-1; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:23:14 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 2rfS-sZcMiqrVXlJbqA75w-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 1so99637vsf.17 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 06:23:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fNpQLXX57UxUvbHDqxXfWhj/ClgBHcVAetZc4IJVX44=; b=TRYMu2Adnmi4oKNRfrM/tKRC1bm9YOrA1sdfu5aVw/9lsc+OYChKPwBNWoT5TXieJk HL3W9ctGXBYhZFxX2jeZX3owsefb47C9cZNIgs6vKBvLU5dlrm48zKgj7qp40tz7rxWj qvgiFNMldxLDY56NwLsAIEddpLkfXrJV21dgaUD6mHuFS84E5LjAmf0nTGteWrdpGMi/ 6CENkRqDc1FiPLHXdbDRYmUtlWfoooK01wSddWz2FcVOjeMiTqQTw5WmEw7OX28SELd/ nSTOuCzXUX8+E0h+I1TE5Gu38g96cMw9Igk7XJxiZREiEtTrDn41gPvsIGRlLR1ge8j+ kf7g== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Puaa3sQ7mkMYCJpA23gv+BKxvR16A6B8u9rTAt39zvSnOs7NTvdw T2QoXTjyrgKhIhfRGuiErhPWgVFGsegvm5++yvvZGAd6/pGvypN1qHcV1gUgR8NJgSEujVdXIN9 8BItvbobC0HvuGlwWiRM= X-Received: by 2002:a67:487:: with SMTP id 129mr2313938vse.105.1587129794163; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 06:23:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJIT/EaB4R4ijlkDJ8Tpq4HUw7OVR+muqs3e9yaiQ7qPSdPxeW7ACRLP2hB0xo72t8jywxilxxXgAsS0m2h6Q4= X-Received: by 2002:a67:487:: with SMTP id 129mr2313921vse.105.1587129793903; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 06:23:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200402183253.866-1-jerinjacobk@gmail.com> <20200413145530.8464-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:23:01 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Trahe, Fiona" Cc: dev , Jerin Jacob , Pavan Nikhilesh , "Richardson, Bruce" , Thomas Monjalon , "Yigit, Ferruh" , Hemant Agrawal X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] build: disable experimental API check internally X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 12:21 PM Trahe, Fiona wrote= : > I see this is already applied. > > However, > rte_cryptodev_queue_pair_setup() calls > rte_cryptodev_sym_get_existing_header_session_size() > The former is a stable API, the latter is experimental. > So I expect the build to break when ALLOW_EXPERIMENTAL_API is disabled. > > I tried to build the crypto_perf tool to check this, wasn't clear where i= t gets it, seems like it inherits from here: > mk/target/generic/rte.vars.mk. So I disabled it there and got many build = errors. I suppose you mean dpdk-test-crypto-perf. This tool is compiled inside dpdk, so the flag is inherited from rte.vars.mk as intended. --=20 David Marchand