From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF04DA0562; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 18:15:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD8D161B99; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 18:15:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0549C4013F for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 18:15:51 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1618416948; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aUhypB37eEiFb81KS3esAElaif/DoDYM+QYQKc0B/Qs=; b=HN9WkLeFPhUndICyUH/N/wZrEKbHWBJSAx2T6n9S7yO5OQVh90B/eMns9Mqdph0858CooG uHTAA5hzGBtC0HpG1B2TVUKDAd96mDszWB14pOpvPfEdQ8vY2M0cXjFe/smB4YuFhxDbZ2 JbK0yiqpMuKf3B1cLCQ062cRXQusZ10= Received: from mail-vk1-f200.google.com (mail-vk1-f200.google.com [209.85.221.200]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-492-nrOcXeaQNC24a61KOOouNA-1; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 12:15:46 -0400 X-MC-Unique: nrOcXeaQNC24a61KOOouNA-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f200.google.com with SMTP id b203-20020a1fb2d40000b02901c9714c9241so678430vkf.19 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 09:15:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aUhypB37eEiFb81KS3esAElaif/DoDYM+QYQKc0B/Qs=; b=DL06c9Wma0grSTnxiTVZbsEF/ImmwbEewXa3PiEUgA0Q0DysQg1RLzr25UjeFoxglP PppTMyHDUo9I0b4V7vFuX7ePzG/tQWG3tP728BM82f66YFbh1NW6Erc8wNUzPxUGhOwz 1FjSCDscbM8mWeu2SGFIYk3kIhZWr3BuPEwXPJI+jVt5qTvaG/R6/FQazVaAEuWAllKQ p6frmRdoOieEcXx0gHkC6vR3Zaf9DVBwY6GCDOHES28PYR+/huXY6w5LZ9qofaWBzZEC R14qWerdK4b8yVFUStTqspTlQRYvsswP+WUtg9H/1cP+fvAYrMr1TzkJ78nHLQwppAmL CUnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Rz5O/fz2EDwgrXQXYcgvEo/1AOZS+r0UDvbyicv8c+bfVDs6N yOT46AtEUK1+0/GdKQlIXzCWax7jedRpZl/DbL14ld1Z6ew886vS02Io8TZN+SHGZ396onkQSer W/9QIQhjlxrrJ3X5Ri3E= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:2811:: with SMTP id w17mr27594262uap.86.1618416945783; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 09:15:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxzt/9FOBjNQgFTX7ZQwT96tFzaq+0eub8Dk18TGRgZPrpRx1/zPZhOlZS7AVLzrhglnoa8lzJ9Uoqn7XnW9Sg= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:2811:: with SMTP id w17mr27594239uap.86.1618416945608; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 09:15:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210216094300.27889-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20210216095140.GA136@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20210216095140.GA136@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 18:15:34 +0200 Message-ID: To: Bruce Richardson Cc: dev Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: support using 0 as coremask for no-affinitization X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 10:52 AM Bruce Richardson wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 09:43:00AM +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > Allow the user to specify that they don't want any core pinning from DPDK > > by passing in the coremask of 0. > > --- > > Apologies, missed my signoff, will add in V2, but will wait for feedback on > this V1 first. I did not see a v2, is this still for 21.05? What are the usecases for this feature? I could think of using this in combination with external threads in applications like OVS... ? -- David Marchand