From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B69BA04C7; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:04:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6391BF83; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:04:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E7A1BF7F for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:04:21 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1600178660; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=F+NlG7npvIe7/6xVLF1hHuKgIZJZYFKbFl0tqKk/oaw=; b=JQMyjKLzoM/aQwl2QIPS0VSqTzOyrotMsFua8k132WzsneB3zzWRUVGid8vFs6m9cdQoVX yzCPBQQo6v0dcHvNPwLOEybiGza+FjJqDgwn1JJa8gHTA4KGYq3MVZFyKsCkpUDU+iRrR/ JB9HkGk5K3bVA1Uq1Hk9g8Q8LU1loCc= Received: from mail-vs1-f70.google.com (mail-vs1-f70.google.com [209.85.217.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-349-FbH0CfhxMQyyT5pPt1IBuw-1; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:02:56 -0400 X-MC-Unique: FbH0CfhxMQyyT5pPt1IBuw-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f70.google.com with SMTP id f129so1258901vsc.0 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 07:02:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=F+NlG7npvIe7/6xVLF1hHuKgIZJZYFKbFl0tqKk/oaw=; b=DYpjzxhV7V7fSMmGyNUHP2HPQe76QCepUzA6i0zwrmuOUEwEfcOw05ynLXh8B0SuzJ 57z6BfFSHswe09ql0DTYIfKr9xEBjv+k11hmbAoyyLJDG7nr3iCShpRaC5piWuBN+3QP 8gIiWPA2GG/WnIm7YXTAAIEMVtgb0ZdXrQAR/7uHycbDHCyZjx/D1bqB/HHyN/Enoofo zE7LIGEd8vYLp5R+Bfj8QdbYoJAtolyWwSI+hx4Vp9H3G8QlVus5Ybzr46UHpxRtdcAq r3Lu7FvYouaZQIRgPAr+ewoYxh5liqLynsTPr9gqQrljdRYuR5l6HRuV/X9sUh8SiUaS dU+w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532jUA7gbraccqmAiG6SUYBmcNYZTDvULDxbIqsqH11I16nzi1N/ WiwtXmCM1AhS3QseHHaYBBz6V4dHS8Dj3kJd8cF0e85LAqOdefv0Q0akmvR4y6PZmjEjbGnTRbL 2kclY32N3+s5D6giW3Tw= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:9381:: with SMTP id v123mr1245529vkd.20.1600178575742; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 07:02:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxaFWR2vStVVQHS5CYiNMjl6HBp3E1Xp1nWXwQppmNtXhiwY2JrzVMKn2JFRUitFqxXRAQ1wbn5dGsTCwwi7R0= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:9381:: with SMTP id v123mr1245492vkd.20.1600178575520; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 07:02:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200903152717.42095-1-ciara.power@intel.com> <20200907220711.437405-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20200908081606.GA351@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> <4545352.rp9LHxlyXs@thomas> In-Reply-To: <4545352.rp9LHxlyXs@thomas> From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:02:44 +0200 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon , Nicolas Chautru Cc: Bruce Richardson , dev , Ciara Power Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/31] remove make support in DPDK X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:05 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 08/09/2020 10:16, Bruce Richardson: > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 12:06:40AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > The first 13 commits of this series are pushed to the main branch, > > > making the make-based build an old story. > > > > > > The last 18 commits (devtools, app and doc) are pending > > > for more reviews, especially because the doc rework is > > > still in progress. This is a big change which requires > > > to be split but must be completed soon. > > > *All*, please make the documentation update your highest priority. > > > I will be reluctant to merge some driver changes if the related doc > > > is not updated. > > > > > Thanks for the apply of the code patches, I think it will make all our > > subsequent patch submissions a bit cleaner. > > > > In terms of docs, I believe the Linux and FreeBSD GSG guides to be ready > > for merge, or if not 100% they are at least good enough IMHO to be applied > > now and have some minor tweaks in subsequent patches later. While I'm sure > > the Linux GSG could do with more major rework, that should be separate from > > the doc updates in this patch. > > Of course I am not expecting any major rework in these patches, > but I don't want to apply clean-up half done, > which can drop some relevant informations or introduce mistakes. > > I will review the Linux and FreeBSD user guides first, as you suggest. I could not find a patch in patchwork for app/test-bbdev/test-bbdev.py which still references RTE_SDK and RTE_TARGET. -- David Marchand