DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases
@ 2021-06-03 15:18 Morten Brørup
  2021-06-03 16:10 ` Thomas Monjalon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2021-06-03 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev

Hi all,

Bugfix releases are missing on code.dpdk.org.

E.g. version 17.11 is present, but version 17.11.10 is missing.

Can whoever is the maintainer of code.dpdk.org please fix this.

-Morten


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases
  2021-06-03 15:18 [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases Morten Brørup
@ 2021-06-03 16:10 ` Thomas Monjalon
  2021-06-03 18:15   ` Morten Brørup
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2021-06-03 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Morten Brørup; +Cc: dev, alialnu

03/06/2021 17:18, Morten Brørup:
> Hi all,
> 
> Bugfix releases are missing on code.dpdk.org.
> 
> E.g. version 17.11 is present, but version 17.11.10 is missing.
> 
> Can whoever is the maintainer of code.dpdk.org please fix this.

Ali is the admin of dpdk.org.
I'm not sure your request is easy because stable releases
are in a separate repository dpdk-stable.git.




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases
  2021-06-03 16:10 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2021-06-03 18:15   ` Morten Brørup
  2021-06-03 19:18     ` Thomas Monjalon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2021-06-03 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Monjalon, Ali Alnubani; +Cc: dev

> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Thursday, 3 June 2021 18.11
> 
> 03/06/2021 17:18, Morten Brørup:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Bugfix releases are missing on code.dpdk.org.
> >
> > E.g. version 17.11 is present, but version 17.11.10 is missing.
> >
> > Can whoever is the maintainer of code.dpdk.org please fix this.
> 
> Ali is the admin of dpdk.org.
> I'm not sure your request is easy because stable releases
> are in a separate repository dpdk-stable.git.

Ali, it would be great if you can include them. Not having easy access to browse the source code of the LTS bugfix releases could be a barrier for DPDK users to upgrade to the latest LTS bugfix release.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases
  2021-06-03 18:15   ` Morten Brørup
@ 2021-06-03 19:18     ` Thomas Monjalon
  2021-06-03 19:36       ` Morten Brørup
  2021-06-04  7:00       ` David Marchand
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2021-06-03 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ali Alnubani, Morten Brørup; +Cc: dev

03/06/2021 20:15, Morten Brørup:
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> > Sent: Thursday, 3 June 2021 18.11
> > 
> > 03/06/2021 17:18, Morten Brørup:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Bugfix releases are missing on code.dpdk.org.
> > >
> > > E.g. version 17.11 is present, but version 17.11.10 is missing.
> > >
> > > Can whoever is the maintainer of code.dpdk.org please fix this.
> > 
> > Ali is the admin of dpdk.org.
> > I'm not sure your request is easy because stable releases
> > are in a separate repository dpdk-stable.git.
> 
> Ali, it would be great if you can include them.
> Not having easy access to browse the source code of the LTS
> bugfix releases could be a barrier for DPDK users to upgrade
> to the latest LTS bugfix release.

Actually it's already included (thanks Ali for reminding it to me):
	https://code.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/v20.11/source

There are 2 different repos and that's how it is exposed in this tool.
It may be a bit confusing.
Do you think it would be OK to rename dpdk-stable to dpdk in this tool?



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases
  2021-06-03 19:18     ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2021-06-03 19:36       ` Morten Brørup
  2021-06-04  8:12         ` Thomas Monjalon
  2021-06-04  7:00       ` David Marchand
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2021-06-03 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Monjalon, Ali Alnubani; +Cc: dev

> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Thursday, 3 June 2021 21.18
k-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases
> 
> 03/06/2021 20:15, Morten Brørup:
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
> Monjalon
> > > Sent: Thursday, 3 June 2021 18.11
> > >
> > > 03/06/2021 17:18, Morten Brørup:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Bugfix releases are missing on code.dpdk.org.
> > > >
> > > > E.g. version 17.11 is present, but version 17.11.10 is missing.
> > > >
> > > > Can whoever is the maintainer of code.dpdk.org please fix this.
> > >
> > > Ali is the admin of dpdk.org.
> > > I'm not sure your request is easy because stable releases
> > > are in a separate repository dpdk-stable.git.
> >
> > Ali, it would be great if you can include them.
> > Not having easy access to browse the source code of the LTS
> > bugfix releases could be a barrier for DPDK users to upgrade
> > to the latest LTS bugfix release.
> 
> Actually it's already included (thanks Ali for reminding it to me):
> 	https://code.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/v20.11/source
> 
> There are 2 different repos and that's how it is exposed in this tool.

Great... It was just me not knowing where to click. We learn something new every day!

> It may be a bit confusing.
> Do you think it would be OK to rename dpdk-stable to dpdk in this tool?

Having learned that the box saying "dpdk" is a dropdown, I headed over to my favorite Linux source code browser at Bootlin. And they already have what I was asking for: https://elixir.bootlin.com/dpdk/latest/source

And they call it "dpdk", not "dpdk-stable"... so I support Thomas' suggestion here. Or alternatively: https://code.dpdk.org/ currently redirects to https://code.dpdk.org/dpdk/latest/source. Perhaps it could redirect to https://code.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/latest/source instead.

Now, I have another question: What does code.dpdk.org show for "dpdk" that it does not show for "dpdk-stable"?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases
  2021-06-03 19:18     ` Thomas Monjalon
  2021-06-03 19:36       ` Morten Brørup
@ 2021-06-04  7:00       ` David Marchand
  2021-06-04  7:03         ` Morten Brørup
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2021-06-04  7:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Monjalon, Ali Alnubani; +Cc: Morten Brørup, dev

On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 9:18 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> 03/06/2021 20:15, Morten Brørup:
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> > > Sent: Thursday, 3 June 2021 18.11
> > >
> > > 03/06/2021 17:18, Morten Brørup:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Bugfix releases are missing on code.dpdk.org.
> > > >
> > > > E.g. version 17.11 is present, but version 17.11.10 is missing.
> > > >
> > > > Can whoever is the maintainer of code.dpdk.org please fix this.
> > >
> > > Ali is the admin of dpdk.org.
> > > I'm not sure your request is easy because stable releases
> > > are in a separate repository dpdk-stable.git.
> >
> > Ali, it would be great if you can include them.
> > Not having easy access to browse the source code of the LTS
> > bugfix releases could be a barrier for DPDK users to upgrade
> > to the latest LTS bugfix release.
>
> Actually it's already included (thanks Ali for reminding it to me):
>         https://code.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/v20.11/source
>
> There are 2 different repos and that's how it is exposed in this tool.
> It may be a bit confusing.
> Do you think it would be OK to rename dpdk-stable to dpdk in this tool?

If we do this, in the current state, we lose the non-stable branches.

19.02 and 19.05 (at least) are not present in the dpdk-stable part.
http://code.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/v19.11.8/source

Not sure how to fix this, do we simply need to push release tags to dpdk-stable?


-- 
David Marchand


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases
  2021-06-04  7:00       ` David Marchand
@ 2021-06-04  7:03         ` Morten Brørup
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2021-06-04  7:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Marchand, Thomas Monjalon, Ali Alnubani; +Cc: dev

> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of David Marchand
> Sent: Friday, 4 June 2021 09.01
> 
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 9:18 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > 03/06/2021 20:15, Morten Brørup:
> > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
> Monjalon
> > > > Sent: Thursday, 3 June 2021 18.11
> > > >
> > > > 03/06/2021 17:18, Morten Brørup:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Bugfix releases are missing on code.dpdk.org.
> > > > >
> > > > > E.g. version 17.11 is present, but version 17.11.10 is missing.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can whoever is the maintainer of code.dpdk.org please fix this.
> > > >
> > > > Ali is the admin of dpdk.org.
> > > > I'm not sure your request is easy because stable releases
> > > > are in a separate repository dpdk-stable.git.
> > >
> > > Ali, it would be great if you can include them.
> > > Not having easy access to browse the source code of the LTS
> > > bugfix releases could be a barrier for DPDK users to upgrade
> > > to the latest LTS bugfix release.
> >
> > Actually it's already included (thanks Ali for reminding it to me):
> >         https://code.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/v20.11/source
> >
> > There are 2 different repos and that's how it is exposed in this
> tool.
> > It may be a bit confusing.
> > Do you think it would be OK to rename dpdk-stable to dpdk in this
> tool?
> 
> If we do this, in the current state, we lose the non-stable branches.
> 
> 19.02 and 19.05 (at least) are not present in the dpdk-stable part.
> http://code.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/v19.11.8/source

And even worse, 21.xx are also not present in the dpdk-stable part.

> 
> Not sure how to fix this, do we simply need to push release tags to
> dpdk-stable?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases
  2021-06-03 19:36       ` Morten Brørup
@ 2021-06-04  8:12         ` Thomas Monjalon
  2021-06-04  8:19           ` Morten Brørup
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2021-06-04  8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Morten Brørup; +Cc: Ali Alnubani, dev

03/06/2021 21:36, Morten Brørup:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, 3 June 2021 21.18
> k-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases
> > 
> > 03/06/2021 20:15, Morten Brørup:
> > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
> > Monjalon
> > > > Sent: Thursday, 3 June 2021 18.11
> > > >
> > > > 03/06/2021 17:18, Morten Brørup:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Bugfix releases are missing on code.dpdk.org.
> > > > >
> > > > > E.g. version 17.11 is present, but version 17.11.10 is missing.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can whoever is the maintainer of code.dpdk.org please fix this.
> > > >
> > > > Ali is the admin of dpdk.org.
> > > > I'm not sure your request is easy because stable releases
> > > > are in a separate repository dpdk-stable.git.
> > >
> > > Ali, it would be great if you can include them.
> > > Not having easy access to browse the source code of the LTS
> > > bugfix releases could be a barrier for DPDK users to upgrade
> > > to the latest LTS bugfix release.
> > 
> > Actually it's already included (thanks Ali for reminding it to me):
> > 	https://code.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/v20.11/source
> > 
> > There are 2 different repos and that's how it is exposed in this tool.
> 
> Great... It was just me not knowing where to click. We learn something new every day!
> 
> > It may be a bit confusing.
> > Do you think it would be OK to rename dpdk-stable to dpdk in this tool?
> 
> Having learned that the box saying "dpdk" is a dropdown, I headed over to my favorite Linux source code browser at Bootlin. And they already have what I was asking for: https://elixir.bootlin.com/dpdk/latest/source
> 
> And they call it "dpdk", not "dpdk-stable"... so I support Thomas' suggestion here.

No, what is in bootlin instance is really dpdk, not dpdk-stable.

> Or alternatively: https://code.dpdk.org/ currently redirects to https://code.dpdk.org/dpdk/latest/source. Perhaps it could redirect to https://code.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/latest/source instead.
> 
> Now, I have another question: What does code.dpdk.org show for "dpdk" that it does not show for "dpdk-stable"?

stable releases are only in dpdk-stable but everything is in dpdk-stable.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases
  2021-06-04  8:12         ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2021-06-04  8:19           ` Morten Brørup
  2021-06-04  8:47             ` Thomas Monjalon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2021-06-04  8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Monjalon, Ali Alnubani; +Cc: dev

> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Friday, 4 June 2021 10.12
> 
> 03/06/2021 21:36, Morten Brørup:
> > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 3 June 2021 21.18
> > k-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases
> > >
> > > 03/06/2021 20:15, Morten Brørup:
> > > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
> > > Monjalon
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, 3 June 2021 18.11
> > > > >
> > > > > 03/06/2021 17:18, Morten Brørup:
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bugfix releases are missing on code.dpdk.org.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > E.g. version 17.11 is present, but version 17.11.10 is
> missing.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can whoever is the maintainer of code.dpdk.org please fix
> this.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ali is the admin of dpdk.org.
> > > > > I'm not sure your request is easy because stable releases
> > > > > are in a separate repository dpdk-stable.git.
> > > >
> > > > Ali, it would be great if you can include them.
> > > > Not having easy access to browse the source code of the LTS
> > > > bugfix releases could be a barrier for DPDK users to upgrade
> > > > to the latest LTS bugfix release.
> > >
> > > Actually it's already included (thanks Ali for reminding it to me):
> > > 	https://code.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/v20.11/source
> > >
> > > There are 2 different repos and that's how it is exposed in this
> tool.
> >
> > Great... It was just me not knowing where to click. We learn
> something new every day!
> >
> > > It may be a bit confusing.
> > > Do you think it would be OK to rename dpdk-stable to dpdk in this
> tool?
> >
> > Having learned that the box saying "dpdk" is a dropdown, I headed
> over to my favorite Linux source code browser at Bootlin. And they
> already have what I was asking for:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/dpdk/latest/source
> >
> > And they call it "dpdk", not "dpdk-stable"... so I support Thomas'
> suggestion here.
> 
> No, what is in bootlin instance is really dpdk, not dpdk-stable.

You are right. I got confused because they also showed the -rc releases.

> 
> > Or alternatively: https://code.dpdk.org/ currently redirects to
> https://code.dpdk.org/dpdk/latest/source. Perhaps it could redirect to
> https://code.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/latest/source instead.
> >
> > Now, I have another question: What does code.dpdk.org show for "dpdk"
> that it does not show for "dpdk-stable"?
> 
> stable releases are only in dpdk-stable but everything is in dpdk-
> stable.

If you meant "dpdk" (not "dpdk-stable") at the end of that sentence, then "dpdk" at code.dpdk.org should show many more tags, as I originally requested.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases
  2021-06-04  8:19           ` Morten Brørup
@ 2021-06-04  8:47             ` Thomas Monjalon
  2021-06-04  9:14               ` Morten Brørup
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2021-06-04  8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Morten Brørup; +Cc: Ali Alnubani, dev, david.marchand

04/06/2021 10:19, Morten Brørup:
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> > > Now, I have another question: What does code.dpdk.org show for "dpdk"
> > that it does not show for "dpdk-stable"?
> > 
> > stable releases are only in dpdk-stable but everything is in dpdk-
> > stable.
> 
> If you meant "dpdk" (not "dpdk-stable") at the end of that sentence, then "dpdk" at code.dpdk.org should show many more tags, as I originally requested.

No I meant dpdk-stable :)
In DPDK we have base releases,
in dpdk-stable we have the maintained base releases and the minor stable releases.
At the end, we don't have all tags in a single repo.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases
  2021-06-04  8:47             ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2021-06-04  9:14               ` Morten Brørup
  2021-06-07 12:49                 ` Ali Alnubani
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2021-06-04  9:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Monjalon, Ali Alnubani; +Cc: dev, david.marchand

> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Friday, 4 June 2021 10.48
> 
> 04/06/2021 10:19, Morten Brørup:
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
> Monjalon
> > > > Now, I have another question: What does code.dpdk.org show for
> "dpdk"
> > > that it does not show for "dpdk-stable"?
> > >
> > > stable releases are only in dpdk-stable but everything is in dpdk-
> > > stable.
> >
> > If you meant "dpdk" (not "dpdk-stable") at the end of that sentence,
> then "dpdk" at code.dpdk.org should show many more tags, as I
> originally requested.
> 
> No I meant dpdk-stable :)
> In DPDK we have base releases,
> in dpdk-stable we have the maintained base releases and the minor
> stable releases.
> At the end, we don't have all tags in a single repo.

OK. Now I get it!

Then code.dpdk.org probably works as intended. It was just me being confused about it, because I'm used to a mono-repo world. "It's a feature, not a bug."

I guess it would be difficult to merge the data from the two repos into one big code.dpdk.org source code browser. Which was your first response to my original request, Thomas. Ali, what do you think?

-Morten

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases
  2021-06-04  9:14               ` Morten Brørup
@ 2021-06-07 12:49                 ` Ali Alnubani
  2021-06-08  9:57                   ` Morten Brørup
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Ali Alnubani @ 2021-06-07 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Morten Brørup, NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon; +Cc: dev, david.marchand

Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 12:14 PM
> To: NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Ali Alnubani
> <alialnu@nvidia.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; david.marchand@redhat.com
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases
> 
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> > Sent: Friday, 4 June 2021 10.48
> >
> > 04/06/2021 10:19, Morten Brørup:
> > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
> > Monjalon
> > > > > Now, I have another question: What does code.dpdk.org show for
> > "dpdk"
> > > > that it does not show for "dpdk-stable"?
> > > >
> > > > stable releases are only in dpdk-stable but everything is in dpdk-
> > > > stable.
> > >
> > > If you meant "dpdk" (not "dpdk-stable") at the end of that sentence,
> > then "dpdk" at code.dpdk.org should show many more tags, as I
> > originally requested.
> >
> > No I meant dpdk-stable :)
> > In DPDK we have base releases,
> > in dpdk-stable we have the maintained base releases and the minor
> > stable releases.
> > At the end, we don't have all tags in a single repo.
> 
> OK. Now I get it!
> 
> Then code.dpdk.org probably works as intended. It was just me being
> confused about it, because I'm used to a mono-repo world. "It's a feature,
> not a bug."
> 
> I guess it would be difficult to merge the data from the two repos into one
> big code.dpdk.org source code browser. Which was your first response to my
> original request, Thomas. Ali, what do you think?

I don't think it's too difficult to merge the tags of both repos under a single project in code.dpdk.org. Will need to verify though.
Let me know if you think it's better to do so.

Thanks,
Ali

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases
  2021-06-07 12:49                 ` Ali Alnubani
@ 2021-06-08  9:57                   ` Morten Brørup
  2021-06-08 10:23                     ` Thomas Monjalon
                                       ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2021-06-08  9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ali Alnubani, NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon, david.marchand,
	Luca Boccassi, Kevin Traynor
  Cc: dev

+ Stable maintainers: Luca Boccassi, Kevin Traynor.

> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ali Alnubani
> Sent: Monday, 7 June 2021 14.49
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > From: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> > Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 12:14 PM
> >
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
> Monjalon
> > > Sent: Friday, 4 June 2021 10.48
> > >
> > > 04/06/2021 10:19, Morten Brørup:
> > > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
> > > Monjalon
> > > > > > Now, I have another question: What does code.dpdk.org show
> for
> > > "dpdk"
> > > > > that it does not show for "dpdk-stable"?
> > > > >
> > > > > stable releases are only in dpdk-stable but everything is in
> dpdk-
> > > > > stable.
> > > >
> > > > If you meant "dpdk" (not "dpdk-stable") at the end of that
> sentence,
> > > then "dpdk" at code.dpdk.org should show many more tags, as I
> > > originally requested.
> > >
> > > No I meant dpdk-stable :)
> > > In DPDK we have base releases,
> > > in dpdk-stable we have the maintained base releases and the minor
> > > stable releases.
> > > At the end, we don't have all tags in a single repo.
> >
> > OK. Now I get it!
> >
> > Then code.dpdk.org probably works as intended. It was just me being
> > confused about it, because I'm used to a mono-repo world. "It's a
> feature,
> > not a bug."
> >
> > I guess it would be difficult to merge the data from the two repos
> into one
> > big code.dpdk.org source code browser. Which was your first response
> to my
> > original request, Thomas. Ali, what do you think?
> 
> I don't think it's too difficult to merge the tags of both repos under
> a single project in code.dpdk.org. Will need to verify though.
> Let me know if you think it's better to do so.
> 

As a frequent user of code.dpdk.org, I think it would be great.

Thomas, David, Luca and Kevin, do any of you oppose to code.dpdk.org showing both the "dpdk" and the "dpdk-stable" repos merged together as one project, if Ali can do it?

-Morten

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases
  2021-06-08  9:57                   ` Morten Brørup
@ 2021-06-08 10:23                     ` Thomas Monjalon
  2021-06-08 13:42                       ` Luca Boccassi
  2021-06-08 10:35                     ` Kevin Traynor
  2021-06-08 12:09                     ` David Marchand
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2021-06-08 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ali Alnubani, david.marchand, Luca Boccassi, Kevin Traynor,
	Morten Brørup
  Cc: dev

08/06/2021 11:57, Morten Brørup:
> + Stable maintainers: Luca Boccassi, Kevin Traynor.
> 
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ali Alnubani
> > Sent: Monday, 7 June 2021 14.49
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > > From: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> > > Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 12:14 PM
> > >
> > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
> > Monjalon
> > > > Sent: Friday, 4 June 2021 10.48
> > > >
> > > > 04/06/2021 10:19, Morten Brørup:
> > > > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
> > > > Monjalon
> > > > > > > Now, I have another question: What does code.dpdk.org show
> > for
> > > > "dpdk"
> > > > > > that it does not show for "dpdk-stable"?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > stable releases are only in dpdk-stable but everything is in
> > dpdk-
> > > > > > stable.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you meant "dpdk" (not "dpdk-stable") at the end of that
> > sentence,
> > > > then "dpdk" at code.dpdk.org should show many more tags, as I
> > > > originally requested.
> > > >
> > > > No I meant dpdk-stable :)
> > > > In DPDK we have base releases,
> > > > in dpdk-stable we have the maintained base releases and the minor
> > > > stable releases.
> > > > At the end, we don't have all tags in a single repo.
> > >
> > > OK. Now I get it!
> > >
> > > Then code.dpdk.org probably works as intended. It was just me being
> > > confused about it, because I'm used to a mono-repo world. "It's a
> > feature,
> > > not a bug."
> > >
> > > I guess it would be difficult to merge the data from the two repos
> > into one
> > > big code.dpdk.org source code browser. Which was your first response
> > to my
> > > original request, Thomas. Ali, what do you think?
> > 
> > I don't think it's too difficult to merge the tags of both repos under
> > a single project in code.dpdk.org. Will need to verify though.
> > Let me know if you think it's better to do so.
> > 
> 
> As a frequent user of code.dpdk.org, I think it would be great.
> 
> Thomas, David, Luca and Kevin, do any of you oppose to code.dpdk.org showing both the "dpdk" and the "dpdk-stable" repos merged together as one project, if Ali can do it?

I am OK with such change.




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases
  2021-06-08  9:57                   ` Morten Brørup
  2021-06-08 10:23                     ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2021-06-08 10:35                     ` Kevin Traynor
  2021-06-08 12:09                     ` David Marchand
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Traynor @ 2021-06-08 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Morten Brørup, Ali Alnubani, NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon,
	david.marchand, Luca Boccassi, xuemingl, Christian Ehrhardt
  Cc: dev

+Cc: Christian and Steven

On 08/06/2021 10:57, Morten Brørup wrote:
> + Stable maintainers: Luca Boccassi, Kevin Traynor.
> 
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ali Alnubani
>> Sent: Monday, 7 June 2021 14.49
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> From: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 12:14 PM
>>>
>>>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
>> Monjalon
>>>> Sent: Friday, 4 June 2021 10.48
>>>>
>>>> 04/06/2021 10:19, Morten Brørup:
>>>>>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
>>>> Monjalon
>>>>>>> Now, I have another question: What does code.dpdk.org show
>> for
>>>> "dpdk"
>>>>>> that it does not show for "dpdk-stable"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> stable releases are only in dpdk-stable but everything is in
>> dpdk-
>>>>>> stable.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you meant "dpdk" (not "dpdk-stable") at the end of that
>> sentence,
>>>> then "dpdk" at code.dpdk.org should show many more tags, as I
>>>> originally requested.
>>>>
>>>> No I meant dpdk-stable :)
>>>> In DPDK we have base releases,
>>>> in dpdk-stable we have the maintained base releases and the minor
>>>> stable releases.
>>>> At the end, we don't have all tags in a single repo.
>>>
>>> OK. Now I get it!
>>>
>>> Then code.dpdk.org probably works as intended. It was just me being
>>> confused about it, because I'm used to a mono-repo world. "It's a
>> feature,
>>> not a bug."
>>>
>>> I guess it would be difficult to merge the data from the two repos
>> into one
>>> big code.dpdk.org source code browser. Which was your first response
>> to my
>>> original request, Thomas. Ali, what do you think?
>>
>> I don't think it's too difficult to merge the tags of both repos under
>> a single project in code.dpdk.org. Will need to verify though.
>> Let me know if you think it's better to do so.
>>
> 
> As a frequent user of code.dpdk.org, I think it would be great.
> 
> Thomas, David, Luca and Kevin, do any of you oppose to code.dpdk.org showing both the "dpdk" and the "dpdk-stable" repos merged together as one project, if Ali can do it?
> 

It seems all the info there, but the request is to have it combined on
the front page to avoid knowing to switch from dpdk->dpdk-stable? No
objection, it seems helpful, if low priority.

> -Morten
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases
  2021-06-08  9:57                   ` Morten Brørup
  2021-06-08 10:23                     ` Thomas Monjalon
  2021-06-08 10:35                     ` Kevin Traynor
@ 2021-06-08 12:09                     ` David Marchand
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2021-06-08 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Morten Brørup
  Cc: Ali Alnubani, NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon, Luca Boccassi,
	Kevin Traynor, dev

On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 11:58 AM Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com> wrote:
> As a frequent user of code.dpdk.org, I think it would be great.
>
> Thomas, David, Luca and Kevin, do any of you oppose to code.dpdk.org showing both the "dpdk" and the "dpdk-stable" repos merged together as one project, if Ali can do it?

I exchanged with Ali on some details, it does not seem that difficult
to implement.
No objection, it seems less confusing for users.


-- 
David Marchand


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases
  2021-06-08 10:23                     ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2021-06-08 13:42                       ` Luca Boccassi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Luca Boccassi @ 2021-06-08 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Monjalon, Ali Alnubani, david.marchand, Kevin Traynor,
	Morten Brørup
  Cc: dev

On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 12:23 +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 08/06/2021 11:57, Morten Brørup:
> > + Stable maintainers: Luca Boccassi, Kevin Traynor.
> > 
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ali Alnubani
> > > Sent: Monday, 7 June 2021 14.49
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > > From: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> > > > Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 12:14 PM
> > > > 
> > > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
> > > Monjalon
> > > > > Sent: Friday, 4 June 2021 10.48
> > > > > 
> > > > > 04/06/2021 10:19, Morten Brørup:
> > > > > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
> > > > > Monjalon
> > > > > > > > Now, I have another question: What does code.dpdk.org show
> > > for
> > > > > "dpdk"
> > > > > > > that it does not show for "dpdk-stable"?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > stable releases are only in dpdk-stable but everything is in
> > > dpdk-
> > > > > > > stable.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > If you meant "dpdk" (not "dpdk-stable") at the end of that
> > > sentence,
> > > > > then "dpdk" at code.dpdk.org should show many more tags, as I
> > > > > originally requested.
> > > > > 
> > > > > No I meant dpdk-stable :)
> > > > > In DPDK we have base releases,
> > > > > in dpdk-stable we have the maintained base releases and the minor
> > > > > stable releases.
> > > > > At the end, we don't have all tags in a single repo.
> > > > 
> > > > OK. Now I get it!
> > > > 
> > > > Then code.dpdk.org probably works as intended. It was just me being
> > > > confused about it, because I'm used to a mono-repo world. "It's a
> > > feature,
> > > > not a bug."
> > > > 
> > > > I guess it would be difficult to merge the data from the two repos
> > > into one
> > > > big code.dpdk.org source code browser. Which was your first response
> > > to my
> > > > original request, Thomas. Ali, what do you think?
> > > 
> > > I don't think it's too difficult to merge the tags of both repos under
> > > a single project in code.dpdk.org. Will need to verify though.
> > > Let me know if you think it's better to do so.
> > > 
> > 
> > As a frequent user of code.dpdk.org, I think it would be great.
> > 
> > Thomas, David, Luca and Kevin, do any of you oppose to code.dpdk.org showing both the "dpdk" and the "dpdk-stable" repos merged together as one project, if Ali can do it?
> 
> I am OK with such change.
> 
Sounds good to me too - thanks!

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-08 13:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-03 15:18 [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases Morten Brørup
2021-06-03 16:10 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-06-03 18:15   ` Morten Brørup
2021-06-03 19:18     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-06-03 19:36       ` Morten Brørup
2021-06-04  8:12         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-06-04  8:19           ` Morten Brørup
2021-06-04  8:47             ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-06-04  9:14               ` Morten Brørup
2021-06-07 12:49                 ` Ali Alnubani
2021-06-08  9:57                   ` Morten Brørup
2021-06-08 10:23                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-06-08 13:42                       ` Luca Boccassi
2021-06-08 10:35                     ` Kevin Traynor
2021-06-08 12:09                     ` David Marchand
2021-06-04  7:00       ` David Marchand
2021-06-04  7:03         ` Morten Brørup

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git