From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD45A0C4B; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 09:38:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD43D40DF8; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 09:38:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6463640689 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 09:38:04 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1635669483; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rwPNslZD8ml6l21OQ+wUCjNKphoB45eC1YSDHCutVxk=; b=WgwDdwDOqgZ1uQeT+ECz3qN5VqXh2truDJj5RxBbaBZD5n3POhCebqYadlOXcwoQNNFuBA ZRZsYVCWLp0Iu+KH3QWm7Dvb2dXIV4lmE+g+MlkbM78MJgc0rEHqaHPQNu4HNH1uH5F/p1 xj7ENFxhcNl0gnvztdP0ualLtnkFlJg= Received: from mail-lj1-f198.google.com (mail-lj1-f198.google.com [209.85.208.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-62-YhB6OQGGOmKrLEdTQ-quhg-1; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 04:38:02 -0400 X-MC-Unique: YhB6OQGGOmKrLEdTQ-quhg-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f198.google.com with SMTP id n9-20020a2e9049000000b00212acec7473so4024583ljg.22 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 01:38:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rwPNslZD8ml6l21OQ+wUCjNKphoB45eC1YSDHCutVxk=; b=YmX6RuIkAMc4Yj5tAQ0LZesVKWWqpxuC55ZJKatNWJYhJJQomNoGXC+pTivTSMZlT5 QQDuM/LwEOvsBmvFkdyQhdb9RMU17Q/nwYOqqneBAIL6iMhsL85nNuktXxsKVEy62Keb UBXHk6+u6bOKKAy3PPWM3Q0kMAJLWqZkeX+5AGLI6i2x0rvWer7wgis1Caqs6CD/lEKO VUmFdTFUZFsHCjgfXH1zSqVDUSJ5nHTU3dtnbun/AR3ZiFhelLWsxGQPzW7+aA1/GXBj b2ggeGLZXxFe2/XftTdlGajhHZi5n2YQ3r4ZI5puwWV1pqlQOUrn0sWlZTQlLDwR7YNk RU5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531487TdjIl0gw+Nq4nqBoY3i8M4JlzWN7QwsBnN8VgOk/zoFne0 Oe0kEAPG3ms/DCbtPOnJQ21WSw+Ne8F49yQ9y1T4kjhtz8Co9/gUuwN18W/1DEs6DAKJABFep6D Xkhm3ZWxlYc8vVnjssrs= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8799:: with SMTP id n25mr16503305lji.297.1635669481041; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 01:38:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+LayqHQY3NW+++BtaEpC/WfdMXaD4doLSf1Xb6wNXLAu8Vjj6fx87yyzWUaiuqCGscRklCXRmiGqFCHVuhf4= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8799:: with SMTP id n25mr16503283lji.297.1635669480893; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 01:38:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210902053253.3017858-1-feifei.wang2@arm.com> <20211029082021.945586-1-feifei.wang2@arm.com> <20211029082021.945586-4-feifei.wang2@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20211029082021.945586-4-feifei.wang2@arm.com> From: David Marchand Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 09:37:49 +0100 Message-ID: To: Feifei Wang Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli , dev , nd , Jerin Jacob , Stephen Hemminger , Thomas Monjalon , =?UTF-8?Q?Mattias_R=C3=B6nnblom?= , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , Ruifeng Wang Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/5] eal: use wait event scheme for mcslock X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:21 AM Feifei Wang wrote: > > Instead of polling for mcslock to be updated, use wait event scheme > for this case. Title prefix mcslock: > > Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang -- David Marchand