* [PATCH 1/1] examples/l3fwd: fix scalar LPM compilation
@ 2022-05-10 11:58 Stanislaw Kardach
2022-05-11 11:38 ` David Marchand
2022-05-11 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 " Stanislaw Kardach
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stanislaw Kardach @ 2022-05-10 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Stanislaw Kardach, Frank Zhao, Sam Grove, mw, upstream, pbhagavatula
The lpm_process_event_pkt() can either process a packet using an
architecture specific (defined for X86/SSE, ARM/Neon and PPC64/Altivec)
path or a scalar one. The choice is however done using an ifdef
pre-processor macro. Because of that the scalar version was apparently
not widely excersized/compiled.
Due to some copy/paste errors, the scalar logic in
lpm_process_event_pkt() retained a "continue" statement where a BAD_PORT
should be returned after refactoring of the LPM logic in the l3fwd
example.
Fixes: 99fc91d18082 ("examples/l3fwd: add event lpm main loop")
Cc: pbhagavatula@marvell.com
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Kardach <kda@semihalf.com>
---
examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
index bec22c44cd..6e1defbf7f 100644
--- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
+++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ lpm_process_event_pkt(const struct lcore_conf *lconf, struct rte_mbuf *mbuf)
if (is_valid_ipv4_pkt(ipv4_hdr, mbuf->pkt_len)
< 0) {
mbuf->port = BAD_PORT;
- continue;
+ return mbuf->port;
}
/* Update time to live and header checksum */
--(ipv4_hdr->time_to_live);
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] examples/l3fwd: fix scalar LPM compilation
2022-05-10 11:58 [PATCH 1/1] examples/l3fwd: fix scalar LPM compilation Stanislaw Kardach
@ 2022-05-11 11:38 ` David Marchand
2022-05-11 14:18 ` Stanisław Kardach
2022-05-11 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 " Stanislaw Kardach
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2022-05-11 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislaw Kardach
Cc: dev, Frank Zhao, Sam Grove, Marcin Wojtas, upstream,
Pavan Nikhilesh, Honnappa Nagarahalli, Konstantin Ananyev
Hello Stanislaw,
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 1:59 PM Stanislaw Kardach <kda@semihalf.com> wrote:
>
> The lpm_process_event_pkt() can either process a packet using an
> architecture specific (defined for X86/SSE, ARM/Neon and PPC64/Altivec)
> path or a scalar one. The choice is however done using an ifdef
> pre-processor macro. Because of that the scalar version was apparently
> not widely excersized/compiled.
> Due to some copy/paste errors, the scalar logic in
> lpm_process_event_pkt() retained a "continue" statement where a BAD_PORT
> should be returned after refactoring of the LPM logic in the l3fwd
> example.
>
> Fixes: 99fc91d18082 ("examples/l3fwd: add event lpm main loop")
> Cc: pbhagavatula@marvell.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Kardach <kda@semihalf.com>
> ---
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
> index bec22c44cd..6e1defbf7f 100644
> --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
> @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ lpm_process_event_pkt(const struct lcore_conf *lconf, struct rte_mbuf *mbuf)
> if (is_valid_ipv4_pkt(ipv4_hdr, mbuf->pkt_len)
> < 0) {
> mbuf->port = BAD_PORT;
> - continue;
> + return mbuf->port;
> }
> /* Update time to live and header checksum */
> --(ipv4_hdr->time_to_live);
Based on the vector specific implemtations of process_packet in this
example, this code could be replaced with a call to rfc1812_process().
Eth macs updates can be moved prior to rfc1812_process.
What do you think of (untested):
diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
index bec22c44cd..c73cbda6b5 100644
--- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
+++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
@@ -234,33 +234,18 @@ lpm_process_event_pkt(const struct lcore_conf
*lconf, struct rte_mbuf *mbuf)
|| defined RTE_ARCH_PPC_64
process_packet(mbuf, &mbuf->port);
#else
-
struct rte_ether_hdr *eth_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mbuf,
struct rte_ether_hdr *);
-#ifdef DO_RFC_1812_CHECKS
- struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr;
- if (RTE_ETH_IS_IPV4_HDR(mbuf->packet_type)) {
- /* Handle IPv4 headers.*/
- ipv4_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(mbuf,
- struct rte_ipv4_hdr *,
- sizeof(struct rte_ether_hdr));
-
- if (is_valid_ipv4_pkt(ipv4_hdr, mbuf->pkt_len)
- < 0) {
- mbuf->port = BAD_PORT;
- continue;
- }
- /* Update time to live and header checksum */
- --(ipv4_hdr->time_to_live);
- ++(ipv4_hdr->hdr_checksum);
- }
-#endif
+
/* dst addr */
*(uint64_t *)ð_hdr->dst_addr = dest_eth_addr[mbuf->port];
/* src addr */
rte_ether_addr_copy(&ports_eth_addr[mbuf->port],
ð_hdr->src_addr);
+
+ rfc1812_process((struct rte_ipv4_hdr *)(eth_hdr + 1), &mbuf->port,
+ mbuf->packet_type);
#endif
return mbuf->port;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] examples/l3fwd: fix scalar LPM compilation
2022-05-11 11:38 ` David Marchand
@ 2022-05-11 14:18 ` Stanisław Kardach
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stanisław Kardach @ 2022-05-11 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Marchand
Cc: dev, Frank Zhao, Sam Grove, Marcin Wojtas, upstream,
Pavan Nikhilesh, Honnappa Nagarahalli, Konstantin Ananyev
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 1:39 PM David Marchand
<david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
<snip>
> Based on the vector specific implemtations of process_packet in this
> example, this code could be replaced with a call to rfc1812_process().
> Eth macs updates can be moved prior to rfc1812_process.
>
> What do you think of (untested):
That actually looks a lot better! Though it seems safer to use
rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset() for getting the ipv4_hdr. I'll post V2 with
this update.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/1] examples/l3fwd: fix scalar LPM compilation
2022-05-10 11:58 [PATCH 1/1] examples/l3fwd: fix scalar LPM compilation Stanislaw Kardach
2022-05-11 11:38 ` David Marchand
@ 2022-05-11 14:56 ` Stanislaw Kardach
2022-05-19 14:53 ` David Marchand
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stanislaw Kardach @ 2022-05-11 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Stanislaw Kardach, Frank Zhao, Sam Grove, mw, upstream, pbhagavatula
The lpm_process_event_pkt() can either process a packet using an
architecture specific (defined for X86/SSE, ARM/Neon and PPC64/Altivec)
path or a scalar one. The choice is however done using an ifdef
pre-processor macro. Because of that the scalar version was apparently
not widely excersized/compiled.
Due to some copy/paste errors, the scalar logic in
lpm_process_event_pkt() retained a "continue" statement where it should
utilize rfc1812_process() and return the port/BAD_PORT.
Fixes: 99fc91d18082 ("examples/l3fwd: add event lpm main loop")
Cc: pbhagavatula@marvell.com
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Kardach <kda@semihalf.com>
---
v2: Replace existing logic with rfc1812_process().
---
examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c | 24 ++++++------------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
index bec22c44cd..7a1e60f6b3 100644
--- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
+++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#include <rte_lpm6.h>
#include "l3fwd.h"
+#include "l3fwd_common.h"
#include "l3fwd_event.h"
#include "lpm_route_parse.c"
@@ -237,30 +238,17 @@ lpm_process_event_pkt(const struct lcore_conf *lconf, struct rte_mbuf *mbuf)
struct rte_ether_hdr *eth_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mbuf,
struct rte_ether_hdr *);
-#ifdef DO_RFC_1812_CHECKS
- struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr;
- if (RTE_ETH_IS_IPV4_HDR(mbuf->packet_type)) {
- /* Handle IPv4 headers.*/
- ipv4_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(mbuf,
- struct rte_ipv4_hdr *,
- sizeof(struct rte_ether_hdr));
-
- if (is_valid_ipv4_pkt(ipv4_hdr, mbuf->pkt_len)
- < 0) {
- mbuf->port = BAD_PORT;
- continue;
- }
- /* Update time to live and header checksum */
- --(ipv4_hdr->time_to_live);
- ++(ipv4_hdr->hdr_checksum);
- }
-#endif
+
/* dst addr */
*(uint64_t *)ð_hdr->dst_addr = dest_eth_addr[mbuf->port];
/* src addr */
rte_ether_addr_copy(&ports_eth_addr[mbuf->port],
ð_hdr->src_addr);
+
+ rfc1812_process(rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(mbuf, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *,
+ sizeof(struct rte_ether_hdr)),
+ &mbuf->port, mbuf->packet_type);
#endif
return mbuf->port;
}
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] examples/l3fwd: fix scalar LPM compilation
2022-05-11 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 " Stanislaw Kardach
@ 2022-05-19 14:53 ` David Marchand
2022-05-23 13:29 ` David Marchand
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2022-05-19 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislaw Kardach
Cc: dev, Frank Zhao, Sam Grove, Marcin Wojtas, upstream,
Pavan Nikhilesh, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran, Konstantin Ananyev,
Vladimir Medvedkin
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 4:57 PM Stanislaw Kardach <kda@semihalf.com> wrote:
>
> The lpm_process_event_pkt() can either process a packet using an
> architecture specific (defined for X86/SSE, ARM/Neon and PPC64/Altivec)
> path or a scalar one. The choice is however done using an ifdef
> pre-processor macro. Because of that the scalar version was apparently
> not widely excersized/compiled.
> Due to some copy/paste errors, the scalar logic in
> lpm_process_event_pkt() retained a "continue" statement where it should
> utilize rfc1812_process() and return the port/BAD_PORT.
>
> Fixes: 99fc91d18082 ("examples/l3fwd: add event lpm main loop")
> Cc: pbhagavatula@marvell.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Kardach <kda@semihalf.com>
Reviewed-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
--
David Marchand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] examples/l3fwd: fix scalar LPM compilation
2022-05-19 14:53 ` David Marchand
@ 2022-05-23 13:29 ` David Marchand
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2022-05-23 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislaw Kardach
Cc: dev, Frank Zhao, Sam Grove, Marcin Wojtas, upstream,
Pavan Nikhilesh, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran, Konstantin Ananyev,
Vladimir Medvedkin
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:53 PM David Marchand
<david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 4:57 PM Stanislaw Kardach <kda@semihalf.com> wrote:
> >
> > The lpm_process_event_pkt() can either process a packet using an
> > architecture specific (defined for X86/SSE, ARM/Neon and PPC64/Altivec)
> > path or a scalar one. The choice is however done using an ifdef
> > pre-processor macro. Because of that the scalar version was apparently
> > not widely excersized/compiled.
> > Due to some copy/paste errors, the scalar logic in
> > lpm_process_event_pkt() retained a "continue" statement where it should
> > utilize rfc1812_process() and return the port/BAD_PORT.
> >
> > Fixes: 99fc91d18082 ("examples/l3fwd: add event lpm main loop")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Kardach <kda@semihalf.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Applied, thanks.
--
David Marchand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-23 13:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-05-10 11:58 [PATCH 1/1] examples/l3fwd: fix scalar LPM compilation Stanislaw Kardach
2022-05-11 11:38 ` David Marchand
2022-05-11 14:18 ` Stanisław Kardach
2022-05-11 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 " Stanislaw Kardach
2022-05-19 14:53 ` David Marchand
2022-05-23 13:29 ` David Marchand
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).