From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C408A09FF; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:41:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E71140E5C; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:41:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF85140E57 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:41:47 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1610376106; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=X17OjY+7PWcQU7EPtGctPZt8APRnD0CxyDP3wQI2lwA=; b=NkHSN8Y3r/h3K8XBhpGRpCJCt+1rmZIP8b5uWi+ki4EVfdTk8w2xfvY5ukCig4O2vx9aNP 5zLa6oe44Bqj0tHy34R4HXoDsfJvUq2IoH9OoqQpVC91JWrgkpers0Jb0LTTg9l2j/BQFt N9dWGHkFDrpDEqSk9hBezEmf551O5BY= Received: from mail-vk1-f197.google.com (mail-vk1-f197.google.com [209.85.221.197]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-485-ApBpHjZUO4uzwUaLlee0-g-1; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:41:45 -0500 X-MC-Unique: ApBpHjZUO4uzwUaLlee0-g-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f197.google.com with SMTP id n24so32235vkm.2 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 06:41:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=X17OjY+7PWcQU7EPtGctPZt8APRnD0CxyDP3wQI2lwA=; b=DqdqsfyzFWMXaZOLHAWPDYQRuGdbCgHmFpHnmKbpGiqfxKsVsUmljAk5gdPIBOA/8L XhZEB22N8vnoPQZezjffftHR47uqObj+apAQD2er7fPdPOfZPOD5QjSRzGHvW7q0oSj+ qXudJPCojLqI47eXEHSjXsXIZ2WrHzH02uWEdJCasrqqnHT6UJvWWvgAwld8VP8LY9Zn uZ2Vm+1E1aD5j1GbdQTzTdCTHyIJAYrdoTIWaN2yTMccOIVn3KSd6pXnF8VjqJ9sNaHs UJuU3/3imF+iuOb6ckX8tj6KaVGm2M4K6ILD8Lb79CvKWzLg2k0tjZGrwkC6BYVTVIP3 i17w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5311ocxtCXnKtYHpCYWUZU/Y6BbKjxSxvT7uIZdF5F7E2LRxxmah pyymx1cp+DXGiOxrUfVeNzXP6edzlDumrp3D7FhWIssHIXr1jTNQt9Fl5Bi/UeculAa4kKGQR48 XKwhWJC4DkZMHMP6LHlY= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:dac7:: with SMTP id r190mr96525vkg.22.1610376104892; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 06:41:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxo65KOdD7ta/at2aZc2ChnvaQmDTys/VNPTENSsY6Mk/7QY763cskwGJh50NfFdJVV47Opj/SzpEdXUb0HvL0= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:dac7:: with SMTP id r190mr96505vkg.22.1610376104704; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 06:41:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201221073848.22366-1-joyce.kong@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20201221073848.22366-1-joyce.kong@arm.com> From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:41:33 +0100 Message-ID: To: Joyce Kong Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli , "Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" , dev , nd Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] lib/rcu: use rte atomic thread fence wrapper instead X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 8:40 AM Joyce Kong wrote: > > Use rte_atomic_thread_fence wrapper which has been provided for > __atomic_thread_fence builtins to support optimized code for > __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST memory order on x86 platforms. > > Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong > Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli Applied, thanks. -- David Marchand