From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911B4A04B5; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 22:50:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726F0CA9E; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 22:50:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C021CA74 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 22:50:29 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1604008228; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1kU3pkZ1ZjLLCaTFUxJXxROGnynVMbfYvkEyiRCfC5M=; b=JAhlGGTF14aGGqUPh0eJEMfy7R59gDomiV08P9hZ011VPEXbD2i2O01Y/qMfROAAbZe0cb URYbA7f8eoTYq+HbDFejxzUaIPJ5oPHxRQcVD2DjPZH3SVoTtK7eTM7QCVtMWdzv9CMYST MMblpeKVlkxNuaM9IDAiiE0Gtho02yk= Received: from mail-vk1-f198.google.com (mail-vk1-f198.google.com [209.85.221.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-435-gD4L7n_PObSTH3tWAseS1g-1; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:50:26 -0400 X-MC-Unique: gD4L7n_PObSTH3tWAseS1g-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f198.google.com with SMTP id l21so1167189vka.22 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 14:50:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1kU3pkZ1ZjLLCaTFUxJXxROGnynVMbfYvkEyiRCfC5M=; b=FO2lvMKVAYRDrJXsrFJ1Wk4tJ+TZOCzpLlxqc9nZ5kf6U0zk7wlMBH+zAZZaxVZVsf jQZqVIFs5f8DStCT3/L8vwqPoqKAkHduhbNdWJHYSsIjOWpgpKD8P+4DCezxDszTUItd fOuwbSvbwbfp/yjL/WiGwwK12/JiP+E8YYr0Ctz/YFVIkV6pDuTB38TtZJ6PpVAmtedQ 20ZrQCbLtid6ZVUZUIUCe7s88mylaPWqWcbbZyYVMqQOyKNHhAlkjH162KhOKvrywYYq qqY2h8nSV6qgQ7dKKJyKYtGe8FKgKTCTCoGe2fbjIQtKpUTvJJ9Bcb+XmjcJb6SE+e6z f3cA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5319u0wvra70zyti4j8X3VEek1FS9GXQguxTIXgXpiU0PYRFNCSK TEGiQkDOK/JxWTkOP2FH4TqZ2bx6wsYmA+F2FOpCZRhTkcs9gUomwcqmNIX5+4B9TT78LJyF/1h XOeS0YLrasGH2bG/i+S4= X-Received: by 2002:a67:2fca:: with SMTP id v193mr5576730vsv.18.1604008225432; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 14:50:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwm+GiXzfPmx/g+NoUcgCi71htSDBUK9xYG+C41V8eRDmbt5GvqFZGDlUJxxAtegl+SndaH50wgRvlCFDKkVXk= X-Received: by 2002:a67:2fca:: with SMTP id v193mr5576720vsv.18.1604008225252; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 14:50:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201023080058.13335-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <20201028210249.9021-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20201028210249.9021-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 22:50:14 +0100 Message-ID: To: dev Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , Sunil Kumar Kori Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] Rework CTF event description storage X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:03 PM David Marchand wrote: > > Following recent increase of an internal array that was limiting CTF event > descriptions, I had a second look at the code. > All of this is slow path, so I see no reason in keeping this limitation > and we can go with dynamic allocations. > > David Marchand (4): > trace: fixup CTF event description at registration > trace: remove size limit on CTF event description > trace: fix metadata dump > trace: make CTF metadata prettier > > lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_trace.c | 44 ++--- > lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_trace_ctf.c | 167 +++++-------------- > lib/librte_eal/common/eal_trace.h | 4 +- > 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 146 deletions(-) Applied. -- David Marchand