From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2CF9A052A; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 12:02:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCDDC95A; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 12:02:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B827BC958 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 12:02:08 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1606388527; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=z19/r5mHbcJc+2CU/xNcWqV6lKtvAq68JIX/Eq9abSo=; b=ehH1FbkGlO61YnYxKKGh1BGfiwIJVohhMwFJX5f4kRWgDlIAvA0EzCnS0Dsn/RCX+BRmle oQEDwHRzNY97X2q/hKYUN91vFlx+B34+v0vVXYb92f/ZvfF6kTkuPAYpvhOMf5mqtLhgdB 8wYpDwvcQVwGXj0Edobxpz+OpmtQ7VY= Received: from mail-vk1-f198.google.com (mail-vk1-f198.google.com [209.85.221.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-210-uz2URwjMNVqK5MhiHjfaMw-1; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:02:03 -0500 X-MC-Unique: uz2URwjMNVqK5MhiHjfaMw-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f198.google.com with SMTP id v190so503420vkb.16 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:02:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=z19/r5mHbcJc+2CU/xNcWqV6lKtvAq68JIX/Eq9abSo=; b=ZvB2hpHiHgdAQz2J/gIQ7DjKSsfwxslxp+pwbr6l/7UMdIs2IjpgcfWGIyN3F8GqVR 5r9m0qm2feW8bI3rgFrmupD7shpn0HhCOvREO7CH/ek4eaCsqC3AF2luBJ+LDGdt10Sr E5kLK7mWNl2+0fgIskbuDZ19Hsoi2iFEmED5F++mtWyaHXReQp5LbGjZqMqo9fz9Yad9 DPgiPlpCqOPsTbz+MYCmpT8aX+/wd4N9zn5581otAC4vY0v196chZ8Swc9dcVFT2Gd9n laTvpB2Ns5shPGTzRU3j9KzIcgzLe75JpCoBoO2r2ziz7rLB9ognHiEJ54oRBpxtihJi FFLw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5309mjqILGjWOGwomYuPw9UxDMeCqtA9jkHr9QaOmKPju+/i/uho f/YoiJ+EusOBUH7EBCArBd093MefinxtvUAZXteKdmISYvhQyhSx9tmcKfH3aLkVJS1JINf/T9S 2viSpHNtLU1OJlf5nNEI= X-Received: by 2002:a67:f613:: with SMTP id k19mr1194703vso.17.1606388522838; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:02:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzFFbnXv3KE0WtFTJ7v7SW5gALRugZ9NFKZNj0cCfhjoQWFV7IrEczXewex73wUDlhrhR08B55kejkCVYKOW4Y= X-Received: by 2002:a67:f613:: with SMTP id k19mr1194682vso.17.1606388522628; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:02:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200909213932.12480-1-m.bilal@emumba.com> In-Reply-To: <20200909213932.12480-1-m.bilal@emumba.com> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 12:01:51 +0100 Message-ID: To: Muhammad Bilal Cc: "Yigit, Ferruh" , "Iremonger, Bernard" , dev , dpdk stable Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] doc: removed typing mistake X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 11:39 PM Muhammad Bilal wrote: > > Here I have removed 'that' from the sentence to make it grammatically > correct, as it seems to be a typing mistake > > Fixes: d0dff9ba445e ("doc: sample application user guide") > Cc: bernard.iremonger@intel.com > > Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal > --- > doc/guides/prog_guide/multi_proc_support.rst | 2 +- > doc/guides/sample_app_ug/multi_process.rst | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/multi_proc_support.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/multi_proc_support.rst > index a84083b96..a0d71a81a 100644 > --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/multi_proc_support.rst > +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/multi_proc_support.rst > @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ can use). > Running Multiple Independent Groups of DPDK Applications > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > -In the same way that it is possible to run independent DPDK applications side- by-side on a single system, > +In the same way, it is possible to run independent DPDK applications side- by-side on a single system, > this can be trivially extended to multi-process groups of DPDK applications running side-by-side. > In this case, the secondary processes must use the same ``--file-prefix`` parameter > as the primary process whose shared memory they are connecting to. > diff --git a/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/multi_process.rst b/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/multi_process.rst > index f2a79a639..87c703b83 100644 > --- a/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/multi_process.rst > +++ b/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/multi_process.rst > @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ One additional enhancement in this sample application is that the server process > This eliminates the need for the client processes to have the portmask parameter passed into them on the command line, > as is done for the symmetric multi-process application, and therefore eliminates mismatched parameters as a potential source of errors. > > -In the same way that the server process is designed to be run as a primary process instance only, > +In the same way, the server process is designed to be run as a primary process instance only, > the client processes are designed to be run as secondary instances only. > They have no code to attempt to create shared memory objects. > Instead, handles to all needed rings and memory pools are obtained via calls to rte_ring_lookup() and rte_mempool_lookup(). Sorry, but I don't see what is wrong with the original form. -- David Marchand