From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Cc: Dodji Seketeli <dodji@redhat.com>,
Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2] ethdev: add dev configured flag
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 11:36:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8y0LRAu74B1y-WMKmWVUYQ1hPBjG1bgRbugr+cJ737wgw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d0afe838-4a38-b493-4db3-b929c1fc25ae@oktetlabs.ru>
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 10:23 AM Andrew Rybchenko
<andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru> wrote:
>
> On 7/7/21 10:39 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 10:36 AM Andrew Rybchenko
> > <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru> wrote:
> >>
> >> @David, could you take a look at the ABI breakage warnings for
> >> the patch. May we ignore it since ABI looks backward
> >> compatible? Or should be marked as a minor change ABI
> >> which is backward compatible with DPDK_21?
> >
> > The whole eth_dev_shared_data area has always been reset to 0 at the
> > first port allocation in a dpdk application life.
> > Subsequent calls to rte_eth_dev_release_port() reset every port
> > eth_dev->data to 0.
> >
> > This bit flag is added in a hole of the structure, and it is
> > set/manipulated internally of ethdev.
> >
> > So unless the application was doing something nasty like highjacking
> > this empty hole in the structure, I see no problem with the change wrt
> > ABI.
> >
> >
> > I wonder if libabigail is too strict on this report.
> > Or maybe there is some extreme consideration on what a compiler could
> > do about this hole...
>
> I was wondering if it could be any specifics related to big-
> little endian vs bit fields placement, but throw the idea
> away...
After some discussion offlist with (fairly busy ;-)) Dodji, the report
here is a good warning.
But it looks we have an issue with libabigail not properly computing
bitfields offsets.
I just opened a bz for tracking
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28060
This is problematic, as the following rule does not work:
+; Ignore bitfields added in rte_eth_dev_data hole
+[suppress_type]
+ name = rte_eth_dev_data
+ has_data_member_inserted_between = {offset_after(lro),
offset_of(rx_queue_state)}
On the other hand, a (wrong) rule with "has_data_member_inserted_at =
2" (2 being the wrong offset you can read in abidiff output) works.
This might force us to waive all changes to rte_eth_dev_data... not
that I am happy about it.
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-07 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-08 8:00 [dpdk-dev] [RFC] lib/ethdev: " Huisong Li
2021-05-31 8:51 ` Huisong Li
2021-06-14 15:37 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-06-29 2:27 ` Huisong Li
2021-07-02 10:08 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-02 11:57 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-07-02 13:23 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-03 8:35 ` Huisong Li
2021-07-03 11:04 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-05 3:03 ` Huisong Li
2021-07-05 9:50 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-05 11:22 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-06 1:47 ` Huisong Li
2021-07-04 20:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-05 3:18 ` Huisong Li
2021-07-05 6:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-05 9:50 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-06 1:48 ` Huisong Li
2021-07-06 3:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V1] ethdev: " Huisong Li
2021-07-06 4:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2] " Huisong Li
2021-07-06 8:36 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-07 2:55 ` Huisong Li
2021-07-07 8:25 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-07 9:26 ` Huisong Li
2021-07-07 7:39 ` David Marchand
2021-07-07 8:23 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-07 9:36 ` David Marchand [this message]
2021-07-07 9:59 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-07 10:40 ` David Marchand
2021-07-07 10:57 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-06 17:49 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-07 9:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V3] " Huisong Li
2021-07-08 9:56 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJFAV8y0LRAu74B1y-WMKmWVUYQ1hPBjG1bgRbugr+cJ737wgw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dodji@redhat.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).