From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDCEA04AA; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:18:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07084C99; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:18:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D9E1DB8 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:18:39 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1599578318; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Tvxt3B7H4Fuh/k3lC0/On8LWNKNBqDUdw2eTSdbTEY4=; b=FyCiW/lfzED7SCxkVwLRizfJ4ic2//OgA6gaBF0bMBK+UE+mSXWC2/85nX5RcCIjoQgGBQ HSPczn6b1gOhxTilwO34rqcfHN0mIP49yccNSUTi/+PJqcXOLASyXCyDaTh9I4usrs7bJP JbHwQcZzN8QUoHNzfvzV2+99rhVCmnE= Received: from mail-vk1-f198.google.com (mail-vk1-f198.google.com [209.85.221.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-166-VfJ-RdsLPFWi_MPxJg0kKw-1; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:18:36 -0400 X-MC-Unique: VfJ-RdsLPFWi_MPxJg0kKw-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f198.google.com with SMTP id r198so4432589vkr.1 for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 08:18:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Tvxt3B7H4Fuh/k3lC0/On8LWNKNBqDUdw2eTSdbTEY4=; b=IihmSkwhejvNqxYVn0I+dOji9OJCRw8nXGyR8Zm2hmgajs4OZ+/wCaXKm6F5/JHEqy bCA+ENJZGOGUwU/YKGOT/q16fvnEuRmRkm58wML0KjgiJCe+dX3J1nXsqDHnqzRq/vn0 LJmzN6uLVOqWtnW+ahiLjtqdw4HkMWmwuQx2E8TVCQVhg+rnaoVSfOAmJnoUPcBpO+GD ZHtDdkvoj2ew3Dx+1zYf3x89AfbQr13nF4D2ZJnjm3XekTqFmNYC9LDA3c8kUE37d+LS pEVqU4Jywk2accEmrPUK4ocnOw2IpbmoYekH3sUCF/vhgeXXKo8RlO9ajsmFinNNEaQ6 LlBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532jjiuy95k5Ql8QWXw4B0Sq9O7zTTSQs+et7zqu5DfaRynwqe1G kK61Or4V5uWVRD7xM4106xN0CXIrThB+A625248x+fLWz/1Gn0u8ky0eaNP+ZGz3xNxQNvG6iIH 1aDStTC8j2Rnh4HvzNUo= X-Received: by 2002:a67:7795:: with SMTP id s143mr14978995vsc.94.1599578316043; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 08:18:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyP5S3hIpk1HQWpwMmWDuQCCmo5eBFPcz8AaIzBOoiWFn5bsRkDROvYyR1PamWhMapZapAIyNu2hDaKG67VvqQ= X-Received: by 2002:a67:7795:: with SMTP id s143mr14978968vsc.94.1599578315780; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 08:18:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200901144948.1978757-1-conor.walsh@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20200901144948.1978757-1-conor.walsh@intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:18:24 +0200 Message-ID: To: Conor Walsh , "Ananyev, Konstantin" Cc: dev Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/bpf: remove experimental tag X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 4:50 PM Conor Walsh wrote: > > The BPF lib was introduced in 18.05. > There were no changes in it's public API since 19.11. > It should be mature enough to remove it's 'experimental' tag. Should RTE_BPF_XTYPE_NUM be dropped? -- David Marchand