From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F92A0524; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 09:00:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF03D40147; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 09:00:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11CF4003C for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 09:00:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1622790055; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kIWg+9m7uEh1abTqEQakMZXVWHi2OBPe/LNO24xExIs=; b=Fho+gM7JTVz092dOCvw3SHKfWeJH0VH8BNJ9VQgi/EKcvkAMZfmDOba5QCIM6kPwu72b2W cQgJ7gjsXq4lGf2YMPaXZVqWQ9Y8Nv30Vn60o8ZBE51ygRrsuQ+z6avwTvcIJcjKAwKheT x/IcotMTt/hmGYWCh0khwRE1ylzStp0= Received: from mail-ua1-f69.google.com (mail-ua1-f69.google.com [209.85.222.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-362-fgSHZY4qPMaTqmF_z1MDLg-1; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 03:00:45 -0400 X-MC-Unique: fgSHZY4qPMaTqmF_z1MDLg-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f69.google.com with SMTP id r4-20020ab070c40000b02902064b454facso3728822ual.6 for ; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 00:00:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kIWg+9m7uEh1abTqEQakMZXVWHi2OBPe/LNO24xExIs=; b=r4iVnZ35BYEauZZOp1/4bn2hQHP2Cwf06EbB1D6MWm26FSNwIQPuh/InaJhiIaEC1+ mdxnkMKOhfrCuFDKLd50vDiFHX9EAL251goUNX/5Ry9t5rgrvmYk/B2DcFDQi1zssWTJ /t19oUmhwHnn4It01+GsjS5Ke03HHnO+jv1ljNons8RnJgf5gOXTQZ7VdaqtpQ0/7BfQ RHxfPzvTUrp7nbOJLmFJv76VCwi2xc8fDZMzkBoj+J7oyA+8BRKoSjfRy+G+Z2hVxM0j o5xPdLeUAZOZcXUeCjeOf/VprgbrK/3VkdiIXRyGsKTcItcsHVXW2NOnwUm0nf2baNSe jFhQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5323a4IF/s/xO2moimqqMILxoONyYkpc4kutzlAts/8LBRCTKK/W jgu7LV0Xy5FAynZIThF9Hgi2yeA1+mSQekOcH+xCsvduj6H+9EI+0qJ5k6AFefpHIN8EEVqrLhR QcJYMsiMo0xsmkIAs3rc= X-Received: by 2002:a67:e01b:: with SMTP id c27mr1308768vsl.27.1622790045424; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 00:00:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxrR+5j1ycaTsO+xWCYv+3F/mvgs0xYSXeXmKzBmvpft1H/Lqfazp2vO82knKbsZReLLC7L4ehU0SQRhOi57XI= X-Received: by 2002:a67:e01b:: with SMTP id c27mr1308750vsl.27.1622790045125; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 00:00:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C61817@smartserver.smartshare.dk> <11041276.vyNeVKDHc6@thomas> <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C61818@smartserver.smartshare.dk> <1835865.ogO8Tvl0ac@thomas> In-Reply-To: <1835865.ogO8Tvl0ac@thomas> From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 09:00:34 +0200 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon , Ali Alnubani Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Morten_Br=C3=B8rup?= , dev Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 9:18 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 03/06/2021 20:15, Morten Br=C3=B8rup: > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > > > Sent: Thursday, 3 June 2021 18.11 > > > > > > 03/06/2021 17:18, Morten Br=C3=B8rup: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Bugfix releases are missing on code.dpdk.org. > > > > > > > > E.g. version 17.11 is present, but version 17.11.10 is missing. > > > > > > > > Can whoever is the maintainer of code.dpdk.org please fix this. > > > > > > Ali is the admin of dpdk.org. > > > I'm not sure your request is easy because stable releases > > > are in a separate repository dpdk-stable.git. > > > > Ali, it would be great if you can include them. > > Not having easy access to browse the source code of the LTS > > bugfix releases could be a barrier for DPDK users to upgrade > > to the latest LTS bugfix release. > > Actually it's already included (thanks Ali for reminding it to me): > https://code.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/v20.11/source > > There are 2 different repos and that's how it is exposed in this tool. > It may be a bit confusing. > Do you think it would be OK to rename dpdk-stable to dpdk in this tool? If we do this, in the current state, we lose the non-stable branches. 19.02 and 19.05 (at least) are not present in the dpdk-stable part. http://code.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/v19.11.8/source Not sure how to fix this, do we simply need to push release tags to dpdk-st= able? --=20 David Marchand