From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDDBA053B; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 15:07:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D69A1C0CF; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 15:07:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7B01C0C9 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 15:07:11 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1580998031; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PPqJPD1v5neVN952+tXB+G3q2jnUO5Z0qqFKcRx/ano=; b=WVlRTyt1TVSMcnXzOxy/xS5PpOfjrcZPsnBIvafCQdiBEFVl5kFExGktLh5lk0DIVKdNX7 rlVHmbh3I4hJnl4opya08BsmZfjBjA+hnF5L8yVBKa+j1EXeU0OMeujZASBus5xcJlVwsU 6u+3EvstqmQz42jomP1LskasAoK50qs= Received: from mail-vk1-f198.google.com (mail-vk1-f198.google.com [209.85.221.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-15-blnTlfoQODW4pz5DXIMDlw-1; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 09:07:09 -0500 Received: by mail-vk1-f198.google.com with SMTP id e25so1992189vkm.2 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 06:07:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ah9wc+uCd9l+Iz9pKL/etYoANMrpfl7SnZ+KfXLWNis=; b=SdRQV69fRiJZEjPxcBG/TbvDHq+Y+ooG0ocvv2zUuY5wMhkLLlDKd0fp0mBfcfUDsd 4TQ1buk8pIhu+pqeVh8H0CIrz9IKZXTuW2yqvuUNabVNKa+yc9lsGcciSNQAWh+djDXG de41cAO68bEHxe/zWrDMjqa6DvSt2vtN1sPwfv6cEyHOGP/Rcgd1IgFit0yUPJqbZcqo aM5IFWQ0LCyKHCH4A7yq/1q4P9knCxqXNURaGn3LXt2gInnNF8bnNiENDGbvl8pxxrfH eQztkO8j1pM2skvNNwY/5eto78deRTuuFXq/MRCFmigmEncqegdr3v7j+3c1jmNHlfrh TEzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWPVq2g+tVBOCji4CXifmsyIPjmXBKve/CEIhl8PNBp5WmTckm7 6qq6yTHCd2T68AFsbflGxt+y7iIA1di/tjZKCkwc21J9XG5rfFOZ/J1VjMCbxzpDhFcXscdDlVR FPbFJzl9IcPNJwDno50g= X-Received: by 2002:a67:f315:: with SMTP id p21mr1776984vsf.39.1580998028313; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 06:07:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwooAZcjYpbNpLzdMtWxv30GGtX5qQPTDAe6dbJSjIG2VQiBspYD44s+A8QoHJu8Cr0oAIBB1iGv7fJu4bIWyE= X-Received: by 2002:a67:f315:: with SMTP id p21mr1776952vsf.39.1580998027907; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 06:07:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200104013341.19809-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> In-Reply-To: <20200104013341.19809-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 15:06:56 +0100 Message-ID: To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: dev X-MC-Unique: blnTlfoQODW4pz5DXIMDlw-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/14] cleanup resources on shutdown X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 2:34 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Recently started using valgrind with DPDK, and the results > are not clean. > > The DPDK has a function that applications can use to tell it > to cleanup resources on shutdown (rte_eal_cleanup). But the > current coverage of that API is spotty. Many internal parts of > DPDK leave files and allocated memory behind. > > This patch set is a start at getting the sub-parts of > DPDK to cleanup after themselves. These are the easier ones, > the harder and more critical ones are in the drivers > and the memory subsystem. I am too short on time to check and integrate this big series in rc2, and from now it would be too risky to take in 20.02. Can you respin it for 20.05 with FreeBSD fixes too? Thanks. --=20 David Marchand