From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502E0A04BB; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 10:47:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2071BA6F; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 10:47:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AFC31BA68 for ; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 10:47:34 +0200 (CEST) Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1601110053; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AXs3E0dH02s6PonpXHi9NxnHZ8j9xVr7tyjDTCVb8G8=; b=R+IsK330dow6yqNbWc9t2DB8PlcPxHSWEhv/6Dv4Ef+9Lpj1llwq17/2TLvgetRTGNx3FJ qMUMI0NTmUHbtjcUu0XUjKyVsIn3JlUTJb/+QRidR0GeGgJXfrP+/oy4nVGOqM5er3sxwa kXhbz05oFidBdIBY80CwQoZsJV0JUIY= Received: from mail-vs1-f70.google.com (mail-vs1-f70.google.com [209.85.217.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-512-LvBCg5cpOaKgztBBIBzO5w-1; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 04:47:31 -0400 X-MC-Unique: LvBCg5cpOaKgztBBIBzO5w-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f70.google.com with SMTP id u12so1647069vsh.18 for ; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 01:47:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AXs3E0dH02s6PonpXHi9NxnHZ8j9xVr7tyjDTCVb8G8=; b=NztqH9IQ6mgUcWHFzPQsLjevrMbWvBRJg31k7XutL3sDXFkJB8ChpWCisLkzAFNVFm ueWKmZaApIgUfxsbjkF9rLvmw4AJw3m/uZqu6EgTJIfSTKhZmScd47JwgbwDa21KVViz 6M8MBMCtiHtp/KZLbZFJMA3NxOksfURba+VVLnqWCvQvrpA5JPugwQSf9dqWLJ483nRG ois3x0GRxghXQmFPe8AD3bk0ztAAr5007Ss2MPNUXVaaXDMlBhz/ev8+fRBWQ4sNIEVZ VGzUim2TfUV/Zzx5Y6tDwTvn5csIWJWcuWJglShpJFByokHaqTGR33xOip7X5eJRLg+s tTmQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530nBLEBjH/gq+7nHzZIjy9DeBXZmBsSj5nwihWdkSyBOaLWnPKl GbWrpbK86Rsvc+GwstKvCjFCflLMHlVv/oD8CcrMXhhKLBGLMF5ZXOLTYeJkEk070QxQS3mVdsB xGXAfpqdueVlUuOmnvsw= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:7313:: with SMTP id v19mr1184476uao.87.1601110050481; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 01:47:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzasI//JgjA0udZL6NnNysYN3UcnXInbinwR/0r/UoUAqVxx+wlR01DG9dXt9UzKJt1UmcyoO7kUP+PQWifILY= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:7313:: with SMTP id v19mr1184470uao.87.1601110050217; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 01:47:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200925161345.23209-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20200925101305.0f5f1040@hermes.lan> In-Reply-To: <20200925101305.0f5f1040@hermes.lan> From: David Marchand Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 10:47:19 +0200 Message-ID: To: Stephen Hemminger , Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] checkpatch: suppress fallthrough warning X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 7:13 PM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 18:41:40 +0200 > David Marchand wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 6:14 PM Stephen Hemminger > > wrote: > > > > > > The DPDK does not have (or want to use) the same fallthrough > > > wrapper as the Linux kernel. Therefore silence the warning. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > > Never mind; note to self look first... > > Didn't see that it was already set. Maybe the issue is that the > scans from patchwork are still using older version of the DPDK script? Ah yes. I updated it on the server. -- David Marchand