From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9440A0C48; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 14:19:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D60B40689; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 14:19:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9536640140 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 14:19:35 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1626783575; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Z17UV8d3D/FKYweIXLP3e2676b/5O5MmF4H4rquqNxA=; b=CtEO6GtaosAz0rD6CjZvsL+ZU3bVyK9D0a0BSUpe8sDgmd+wbI6oYbojgaSf+regd3NOux YkaypEHEYXhrf/14e2Nainh37guQAOfPIZ0Q07BipdZPQ8AycSc15F9E2eP40NOS6XAx8y xJZ6UozVyMlFMjeTL6eGyH1YBO/dDz4= Received: from mail-ua1-f72.google.com (mail-ua1-f72.google.com [209.85.222.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-582-bvS7D1tsMqGFeHCmI59T1Q-1; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 08:19:33 -0400 X-MC-Unique: bvS7D1tsMqGFeHCmI59T1Q-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f72.google.com with SMTP id u20-20020ab021d40000b02902a181c33654so10596076uan.17 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 05:19:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Z17UV8d3D/FKYweIXLP3e2676b/5O5MmF4H4rquqNxA=; b=luDzjsnZIfjwV20+RgriHkC6HdBtGZt3fGUdvSUiszJRjqSKRRUeNZt/4WdIaJpCpe 1pDlyY3hOjGLd2yEMXZmqGI7drBxGPZLvaFb9Pv7MBSwa6Zx/6KEAAh8fTKv/PL07pq8 clycxtwoqQEY8+ezrjWefv2SBiPTufxPyF1cI8FyZiBRG4OkS0KtetMlqvw/J/sBzCcO OLMswKrS+upHLEpeEiFhsveGp/1RkIFlpcwbMdF4so1IxkZfBYlgmi31XMuLNZC+O8Qj 77MGDWdfFB4iborMG6tkTXu2fFyM5HqkCi7k28xNZEC+A82nruY7lZL/IcHY38YMZ+Dy DlVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Qn6M/B13Z5xTMx0aMpzTsWINSYkEZRJpH1LS9dJp1Fu4XnWo7 XcXDgiIl6qSIeXf+VYFP1/774sz3VDP+/BwNDv20KK9I0Sye7BobGgALH0rZzif+8z9vePSGYiF 2IVcW2kYK9nIjSLSf/yo= X-Received: by 2002:a67:f78a:: with SMTP id j10mr1646024vso.10.1626783573438; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 05:19:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzQ5nNQYtrPLMFxSClSWlV35gv+YHfPrOJtRWx9LfHD/JkCBYGZ1M6GF0kudFl421eX4MBH59ENTz26IJMkKnQ= X-Received: by 2002:a67:f78a:: with SMTP id j10mr1646004vso.10.1626783573280; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 05:19:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210527152510.1551026-1-andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru> <20210702083948.546667-1-andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru> In-Reply-To: <20210702083948.546667-1-andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru> From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 14:19:22 +0200 Message-ID: To: Andrew Rybchenko Cc: dev , Ivan Malov , Andy Moreton Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/20] net/sfc: support flow API COUNT action X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 10:40 AM Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > > Update base driver and support COUNT action in transfer flow rules. > > v4: > - fix build on Fedora 32 and RHEL 8 / CentOS 8 with half-installed > libatomic > > v3: > - fix build brekage because of incorrectly rebased and squashed > in fix > > v2: > - add release notes > - add missing documentaion > - fix spelling > - handle query in stopped gracefully > > > Andrew Rybchenko (6): > net/sfc: do not enable interrupts on internal Rx queues > common/sfc_efx/base: separate target EvQ and IRQ config > common/sfc_efx/base: support custom EvQ to IRQ mapping > net/sfc: explicitly control IRQ used for Rx queues > net/sfc: add NUMA-aware registry of service logical cores > common/sfc_efx/base: add packetiser packet format definition I added the missing rte_flow feature in sfc.ini. We had some exchanges offlist on the rte_service requirement. This discussion will probably end up on the ml later. Series applied, thanks. -- David Marchand